CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS or CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS

linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS or CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT?
@ 2007-06-28  9:15 Keith Owens
  2007-06-28 11:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Keith Owens @ 2007-06-28  9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: linux-arch

Arch code tests CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS, but the kconfig files define
CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT.  Which is correct?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS or CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT?
  2007-06-28  9:15 CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS or CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT? Keith Owens
@ 2007-06-28 11:22 ` Matthew Wilcox
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2007-06-28 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Keith Owens; +Cc: no, To-header, on, "input <", linux-arch

On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 07:15:10PM +1000, Keith Owens wrote:
> Arch code tests CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS, but the kconfig files define
> CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT.  Which is correct?

Both:

./lib/Kconfig.debug:config TRACE_IRQFLAGS
./lib/Kconfig.debug:    depends on TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT

_SUPPORT means the arch supports it.  TRACE_IRQFLAGS means it's turned on.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-06-28 11:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-06-28  9:15 CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS or CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT? Keith Owens
2007-06-28 11:22 ` Matthew Wilcox

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).