From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:50312 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753040AbXGKAR4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:17:56 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:16:50 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: fallocate-implementation-on-i86-x86_64-and-powerpc.patch Message-Id: <20070710171650.642881db.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <18068.5612.100418.782729@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <20070710013152.ef2cd200.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070710115251.GG2343@thunk.org> <20070710101558.cea7aab1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <4693C580.2000506@garzik.org> <18068.5612.100418.782729@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Mackerras Cc: Jeff Garzik , Theodore Tso , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Amit Arora , Andi Kleen , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Arnd Bergmann , "Luck, Tony" , Heiko Carstens , Martin Schwidefsky , Mark Fasheh , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:27:40 +1000 Paul Mackerras wrote: > We did come up with an order that worked for everybody, but that > discussion seemed to get totally ignored by the ext4 developers. It was a long discussion. Can someone please remind us what the signature of the syscall (and the compat handler) should be?