From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:60681 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759483AbXGTSNH (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:13:07 -0400 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: build fix for x86_64... Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:13:03 +0200 References: <617E1C2C70743745A92448908E030B2A01FA46A9@scsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com> <46A0F4AC.50809@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <46A0F4AC.50809@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200707202013.03568.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Andreas Schwab , "Luck, Tony" , Randy Dunlap , Arthur Jones , Vasily Tarasov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Obviously, this is not a panacea; if the original "struct foo" has also > been introduced on 64 bits before the bug is caught, That's usually the case. There is already an established 64bit ABI -Andi