From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:58946 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751716AbXGXObI (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:31:08 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 15:31:03 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH respin, was PATCH for review] During VM oom condition, kill all threads in process group Message-ID: <20070724143103.GA25924@infradead.org> References: <20070719348.540885000@suse.de> <20070719134840.47B5114E6E@wotan.suse.de> <20070719140411.GD16279@infradead.org> <1185214185.22237.30.camel@farscape.rchland.ibm.com> <20070723141641.5759a287.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1185287324.22237.39.camel@farscape.rchland.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1185287324.22237.39.camel@farscape.rchland.ibm.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Will Schmidt Cc: Andrew Morton , Geert Uytterhoeven , Christoph Hellwig , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 09:28:44AM -0500, Will Schmidt wrote: > > Just checking... > > > > blackfin > > h8300 > > m68knommu > > uml > > v850 > > > > were not changed. Intentional? > > Yes. Those arch's don't have the VM oom code that I could see. There > is an occasional do_exit() reference elsewhere in the fault handler > code, for reasons other than VM oom, so I deliberately didn't touch > those either. Except for uml these are the !CONFIG_MMU only architectures, so that makes a lot of sense.