From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH respin, was PATCH for review] During VM oom condition, kill all threads in process group
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 11:31:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070731093132.GA5778@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1185214185.22237.30.camel@farscape.rchland.ibm.com>
Hi!
>
> During VM oom condition, kill all threads in process group.
>
> We have had complaints where a threaded application is left in a bad
> state after one of it's threads is killed when we hit a VM: out_of_memory
> condition.
> Killing just one of the process threads can leave the application in a
> bad state, whereas killing the entire process group would allow for
> the application to restart, or be otherwise handled, and makes it very
> obvious that something has gone wrong.
>
> This change allows the entire process group to be taken down, rather
> than just the one thread.
>
> Signed-off-by: Will Schmidt <will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com>
> diff --git a/arch/sparc64/mm/fault.c b/arch/sparc64/mm/fault.c
> index 17123e9..13fdfa3 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc64/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/sparc64/mm/fault.c
> @@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ out_of_memory:
> up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> printk("VM: killing process %s\n", current->comm);
> if (!(regs->tstate & TSTATE_PRIV))
> - do_exit(SIGKILL);
> + do_group_exit(SIGKILL);
> goto handle_kernel_fault;
>
> intr_or_no_mm:
is the printk still accurate (does it kill more than one process now)?
Why does it print when it will not really kill the process?
I see similar code across all the archs... would it make sense to
create common helper... or is the helper too trivial?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-31 9:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070719348.540885000@suse.de>
[not found] ` <20070719134840.47B5114E6E@wotan.suse.de>
2007-07-19 14:04 ` [PATCH for review] [11/48] x86_64: During VM oom condition, kill all threads in process group Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-19 14:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-07-19 15:03 ` Will Schmidt
2007-07-23 18:09 ` [PATCH respin, was PATCH for review] " Will Schmidt
2007-07-23 21:16 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-24 14:28 ` Will Schmidt
2007-07-24 14:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-31 9:31 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2007-07-31 14:55 ` Will Schmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070731093132.GA5778@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will_schmidt@vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).