From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, ak@suse.de, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
davem@davemloft.net, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
wensong@linux-vs.org, horms@verge.net.au, wjiang@resilience.com,
cfriesen@nortel.com, zlynx@acm.org, rpjday@mindspring.com,
jesper.juhl@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently on alpha
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 07:32:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070809143255.GA8424@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070809132442.GA13042@shell.boston.redhat.com>
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 09:24:42AM -0400, Chris Snook wrote:
> From: Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
>
> Purify volatile use for atomic[64]_t on alpha.
Why not the same access-once semantics for atomic_set() as
for atomic_read()? As this patch stands, it might introduce
architecture-specific compiler-induced bugs due to the fact that
atomic_set() used to imply volatile behavior but no longer does.
See below for one approach to fixing this.
> Signed-off-by: Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
>
> --- linux-2.6.23-rc2-orig/include/asm-alpha/atomic.h 2007-07-08 19:32:17.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.23-rc2/include/asm-alpha/atomic.h 2007-08-09 09:19:00.000000000 -0400
> @@ -14,18 +14,22 @@
>
>
> /*
> - * Counter is volatile to make sure gcc doesn't try to be clever
> - * and move things around on us. We need to use _exactly_ the address
> - * the user gave us, not some alias that contains the same information.
> + * Make sure gcc doesn't try to be clever and move things around
> + * on us. We need to use _exactly_ the address the user gave us,
> + * not some alias that contains the same information.
> */
> -typedef struct { volatile int counter; } atomic_t;
> -typedef struct { volatile long counter; } atomic64_t;
> +typedef struct { int counter; } atomic_t;
> +typedef struct { long counter; } atomic64_t;
>
> #define ATOMIC_INIT(i) ( (atomic_t) { (i) } )
> #define ATOMIC64_INIT(i) ( (atomic64_t) { (i) } )
>
> -#define atomic_read(v) ((v)->counter + 0)
> -#define atomic64_read(v) ((v)->counter + 0)
> +/*
> + * Casting to volatile here minimizes the need for barriers,
> + * without having to declare the type itself as volatile.
> + */
> +#define atomic_read(v) (*(volatile int *)&(v)->counter + 0)
> +#define atomic64_read(v) (*(volatile long *)&(v)->counter + 0)
>
> #define atomic_set(v,i) ((v)->counter = (i))
> #define atomic64_set(v,i) ((v)->counter = (i))
How about:
#define atomic_set(v,i) ((*(volatile int *)&(v)->counter) = (i))
#define atomic64_set(v,i) ((*(volatile long *)&(v)->counter) = (i))
Thanx, Paul
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-09 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-09 13:24 [PATCH 1/24] make atomic_read() behave consistently on alpha Chris Snook
2007-08-09 14:32 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2007-08-09 14:53 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-09 15:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-09 15:24 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-09 15:50 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-09 16:20 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-09 18:38 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-09 19:05 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-09 19:19 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-09 19:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-08-09 19:47 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-09 23:02 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-09 16:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-09 16:36 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-09 16:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-09 17:14 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-09 17:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-09 18:13 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-09 18:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-09 19:24 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-10 1:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-10 19:49 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-10 20:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-09 19:17 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-09 18:51 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-09 19:30 ` Chris Snook
2007-08-10 8:21 ` Herbert Xu
2007-08-10 9:08 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-10 15:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-08-10 20:07 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-11 0:00 ` Herbert Xu
2007-08-11 0:38 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-11 0:43 ` Herbert Xu
2007-08-11 0:50 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-08-11 4:38 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070809143255.GA8424@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cfriesen@nortel.com \
--cc=csnook@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wensong@linux-vs.org \
--cc=wjiang@resilience.com \
--cc=zlynx@acm.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).