From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx10.go2.pl ([193.17.41.74]:43518 "EHLO poczta.o2.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751221AbXHVIHu (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Aug 2007 04:07:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:08:54 +0200 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: RFC: drop support for gcc < 4.0 Message-ID: <20070822080854.GD1684@ff.dom.local> References: <20070821132038.GA22254@ff.dom.local> <20070821093103.3c097d4a.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20070821173550.GC30705@stusta.de> <6101e8c40708211441g2ae20412u877082eb611f595e@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: Oliver Pinter , Adrian Bunk , Randy Dunlap , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 09:57:04AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > On Aug 21 2007 23:41, Oliver Pinter wrote: > >I think it's bad idea, when removing support for gcc3.x, while some > >people using debian 3.1 at now and under debian 3.1 the default > >comiler is 3.3.5, when I good know or not!? > > They always lag behind. Yes! Probably that's why they are so darn good! Jarek P.