From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.ocgnet.org ([64.20.243.3]:49393 "EHLO smtp.ocgnet.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751706AbXJRPXW (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:23:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:23:10 +0900 From: Paul Mundt Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/21] KGDB: Request to merge KGDB Message-ID: <20071018152310.GA7299@linux-sh.org> References: <4713B238.4030409@windriver.com> <20071017212025.d8a52694.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071017212025.d8a52694.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: Jason Wessel , lkml , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 09:20:25PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:32:24 -0500 Jason Wessel wrote: > > This is a request to merge KGDB into the mainline kernel. > > This won't work very well. There's a lot of review work to be done here, > and a lot of it by busy architecture maintainers. Expecting people to do > all this review and test work late in the merge window when they're all > madly scrambling to get their bugs^Wpatches into mainline is not reasonable. > This should all have started a month ago. > > So we're looking at a 2.6.25 merge for this work. After this round of > review has settled, please upissue the patches and keep linux-arch (cc'ed > here) copied on everything, thanks. > It would also be nice to balance this out with the utrace merge, as both are going to cause quite a lot of pain on the architecture side.