From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:52232 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757809AbXJRP4M (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Oct 2007 11:56:12 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:54:29 +0100 From: Russell King Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/21] KGDB: Request to merge KGDB Message-ID: <20071018155429.GA16244@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <4713B238.4030409@windriver.com> <20071017212025.d8a52694.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071018152310.GA7299@linux-sh.org> <20071018152552.GA13985@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071018152552.GA13985@infradead.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig , Paul Mundt , Andrew Morton , Jason Wessel , lkml , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 04:25:53PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 12:23:10AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > > It would also be nice to balance this out with the utrace merge, as both > > are going to cause quite a lot of pain on the architecture side. > > I don't think a utrace merge as in one big merge is going to happen ever. > It's just a too big patch doing too many things at once. And the flag day > for switching all architectures over is another blocker. I agree with Christoph - the fact that *all* architectures have to be either ptrace or utrace make it very very painful. What would be good is if some effort could be made by the utrace- interested parties to make the transition to utrace much less painful. For instance, I quite like the getregs/setregs abstractions, and it looks like these *could* be self-contained in a single patch. It would be nice if we could move architectures over to this one a time. Once that's in, that's one chunk of utrace merged. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: