From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:37570 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764599AbXJSHxA (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Oct 2007 03:53:00 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 08:47:06 +0100 From: Russell King Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/21] KGDB: Request to merge KGDB Message-ID: <20071019074706.GA10446@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <4713B238.4030409@windriver.com> <20071017212025.d8a52694.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071018152310.GA7299@linux-sh.org> <20071018152552.GA13985@infradead.org> <20071018155429.GA16244@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20071018160050.GA18508@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071018160050.GA18508@infradead.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig , Paul Mundt , Andrew Morton , Jason Wessel , lkml , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 05:00:50PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 04:54:29PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > > What would be good is if some effort could be made by the utrace- > > interested parties to make the transition to utrace much less painful. > > For instance, I quite like the getregs/setregs abstractions, and it > > looks like these *could* be self-contained in a single patch. It > > would be nice if we could move architectures over to this one a time. > > Once that's in, that's one chunk of utrace merged. > > Alexey Dobriyan had some patches to implement regsets, and these were > posted here on lkml. Given that not all architecture maintainers read lkml, and they are patches affecting all *architectures*, wouldn't it have been a good idea if they'd copied linux-arch? -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: