From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:37671 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755442AbXJVSOf (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:14:35 -0400 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:14:32 +0200 From: Bernhard Walle Subject: Re: - kexec-introduce-bootmem_exclusive.patch removed from -mm tree Message-ID: <20071022181432.GA28693@suse.de> References: <200710212315.l9LNF7nT031930@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <20071022130222.GB16201@suse.de> <20071022111135.0f7527ea.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071022111135.0f7527ea.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: ebiederm@xmission.com, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, vgoyal@in.ibm.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Andrew Morton [2007-10-22 20:11]: > On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:02:22 +0200 Bernhard Walle wrote: > > > * Andrew Morton [2007-10-22 01:08]: > > > > > > The patch titled > > > kexec: introduce BOOTMEM_EXCLUSIVE > > > has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was > > > kexec-introduce-bootmem_exclusive.patch > > > > > > This patch was dropped because it had testing failures > > > > Is it possible for me to find out which "testing failures" the patch > > had? > > I didn't realise that it actually breaks the build on all non-x86. I > cannot carry a patch like that. That's clear, but I already posted the fixup patch for all other architectures on Friday. Thanks, Bernhard