linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: ian <spyro@f2s.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, jejb@steeleye.com,
	kernel-discuss@handhelds.org
Subject: Re: DMA API Re: Remove dma_coherent_mem interface
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 19:07:17 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071101100717.GA26906@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1193910526.25899.278.camel@wirenth>

On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 09:48:46AM +0000, ian wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 15:34 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >   It may not be significant, so it would be an easy decision to keep
> >   the interface.  But if the decision is going to be to keep the
> >   interface despite the lack of users and no matter what the
> >   performance win, then I don't need to finish this work.
> 
> I dont mind what the interface is as long as we can support devices that
> can only DMA from their own local RAM as described above...
> 
Indeed. The SH case for OHCI on MFDs is the same. So that's at least 2
users.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-01 10:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-31 21:03 DMA API Re: Remove dma_coherent_mem interface ian
2007-10-31 21:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-11-01  9:48   ` ian
2007-11-01 10:07     ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2007-11-01 15:33       ` ian
2007-11-01 15:52         ` Bernhard Walle
2008-02-20 17:14 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-02-20 17:49   ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-20 18:43     ` ian
2008-02-20 19:10       ` Andi Kleen
2008-02-20 21:26         ` ian
2008-02-20 22:55           ` Russell King
2008-02-20 23:05             ` James Bottomley
2008-02-21 16:32   ` Paul Mundt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071101100717.GA26906@linux-sh.org \
    --to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jejb@steeleye.com \
    --cc=kernel-discuss@handhelds.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=spyro@f2s.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).