From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pip15.gyao.ne.jp ([61.122.117.253]:19291 "EHLO mx.gate01.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756306AbXKAKH5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Nov 2007 06:07:57 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 19:07:17 +0900 From: Paul Mundt Subject: Re: DMA API Re: Remove dma_coherent_mem interface Message-ID: <20071101100717.GA26906@linux-sh.org> References: <1193864605.25899.253.camel@wirenth> <20071031213447.GF15111@parisc-linux.org> <1193910526.25899.278.camel@wirenth> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1193910526.25899.278.camel@wirenth> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: ian Cc: Matthew Wilcox , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, jejb@steeleye.com, kernel-discuss@handhelds.org List-ID: On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 09:48:46AM +0000, ian wrote: > On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 15:34 -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > It may not be significant, so it would be an easy decision to keep > > the interface. But if the decision is going to be to keep the > > interface despite the lack of users and no matter what the > > performance win, then I don't need to finish this work. > > I dont mind what the interface is as long as we can support devices that > can only DMA from their own local RAM as described above... > Indeed. The SH case for OHCI on MFDs is the same. So that's at least 2 users.