From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
sam@ravnborg.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: + create-arch-kconfig.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:57:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071116015730.GA16953@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711152227.lAFMR5Ck019098@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
* akpm@linux-foundation.org (akpm@linux-foundation.org) wrote:
>
> The patch titled
> Create arch/Kconfig
> has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
> create-arch-kconfig.patch
>
Hi Andrew,
I have an updated patchset for these 4 instrumentation menu patches,
following Sam Ravnborg's comments (using ARCH_HAS_* instead of
ARCH_SUPPORTS_*). I was planning to send them with my next patch round.
create-arch-kconfig.patch
add-arch_supports_oprofile.patch
add-arch_supports_kprobes.patch
move-kconfiginstrumentation-to-arch-kconfig-and-init-kconfig.patch
Mathieu
> *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
>
> See http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
> out what to do about this
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Subject: Create arch/Kconfig
> From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
>
> Puts the content of arch/Kconfig in the "General setup" menu.
>
> Linus:
>
> > Should it come with a re-duplication of it's content into each
> > architecture, which was the case previously ? The oprofile and kprobes
> > menu entries were litteraly cut and pasted from one architecture to
> > another. Should we put its content in init/Kconfig then ?
>
> I don't think it's a good idea to go back to making it per-architecture,
> although that extensive "depends on <list-of-archiectures-here>" might
> indicate that there certainly is room for cleanup there.
>
> And I don't think it's wrong keeping it in kernel/Kconfig.xyz per se, I
> just think it's wrong to (a) lump the code together when it really doesn't
> necessarily need to and (b) show it to users as some kind of choice that
> is tied together (whether it then has common code or not).
>
> On the per-architecture side, I do think it would be better to *not* have
> internal architecture knowledge in a generic file, and as such a line like
>
> depends on X86_32 || IA64 || PPC || S390 || SPARC64 || X86_64 || AVR32
>
> really shouldn't exist in a file like kernel/Kconfig.instrumentation.
>
> It would be much better to do
>
> depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_KPROBES
>
> in that generic file, and then architectures that do support it would just
> have a
>
> bool ARCH_SUPPORTS_KPROBES
> default y
>
> in *their* architecture files. That would seem to be much more logical,
> and is readable both for arch maintainers *and* for people who have no
> clue - and don't care - about which architecture is supposed to support
> which interface...
>
>
> Sam Ravnborg:
>
> Stuff it into a new file: arch/Kconfig
> We can then extend this file to include all the 'trailing'
> Kconfig things that are anyway equal for all ARCHs.
>
> But it should be kept clean - so if we introduce such a file
> then we should use ARCH_HAS_whatever in the arch specific Kconfig
> files to enable stuff that is not shared.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
> Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
>
> arch/Kconfig | 3 +++
> init/Kconfig | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff -puN /dev/null arch/Kconfig
> --- /dev/null
> +++ a/arch/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
> +#
> +# General architecture dependent options
> +#
> diff -puN init/Kconfig~create-arch-kconfig init/Kconfig
> --- a/init/Kconfig~create-arch-kconfig
> +++ a/init/Kconfig
> @@ -673,6 +673,8 @@ config PROC_PAGE_MONITOR
> /proc/kpagecount, and /proc/kpageflags. Disabling these
> interfaces will reduce the size of the kernel by approximately 4kb.
>
> +source "arch/Kconfig"
> +
> endmenu # General setup
>
> config RT_MUTEXES
> _
>
> Patches currently in -mm which might be from mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca are
>
> origin.patch
> add-cmpxchg_local-to-asm-generic-for-per-cpu-atomic-operations.patch
> fall-back-on-interrupt-disable-in-cmpxchg8b-on-80386-and-80486.patch
> add-cmpxchg64-and-cmpxchg64_local-to-alpha.patch
> add-cmpxchg64-and-cmpxchg64_local-to-mips.patch
> add-cmpxchg64-and-cmpxchg64_local-to-powerpc.patch
> add-cmpxchg64-and-cmpxchg64_local-to-x86_64.patch
> add-cmpxchg_local-to-arm.patch
> add-cmpxchg_local-to-avr32.patch
> add-cmpxchg_local-to-blackfin-replace-__cmpxchg-by-generic-cmpxchg.patch
> add-cmpxchg_local-to-cris.patch
> add-cmpxchg_local-to-frv.patch
> add-cmpxchg_local-to-h8300.patch
> add-cmpxchg_local-cmpxchg64-and-cmpxchg64_local-to-ia64.patch
> new-cmpxchg_local-optimized-for-up-case-for-m32r.patch
> fix-m32r-__xchg.patch
> m32r-build-fix-of-arch-m32r-kernel-smpbootc.patch
> local_t-m32r-use-architecture-specific-cmpxchg_local.patch
> add-cmpxchg_local-to-m86k.patch
> add-cmpxchg_local-to-m68knommu.patch
> add-cmpxchg_local-to-parisc.patch
> add-cmpxchg_local-to-ppc.patch
> add-cmpxchg_local-to-s390.patch
> add-cmpxchg_local-to-sh-use-generic-cmpxchg-instead-of-cmpxchg_u32.patch
> add-cmpxchg_local-to-sh64.patch
> add-cmpxchg_local-to-sparc-move-__cmpxchg-to-systemh.patch
> add-cmpxchg_local-to-sparc64.patch
> add-cmpxchg_local-to-v850.patch
> add-cmpxchg_local-to-xtensa.patch
> create-arch-kconfig.patch
> add-arch_supports_oprofile.patch
> add-arch_supports_kprobes.patch
> move-kconfiginstrumentation-to-arch-kconfig-and-init-kconfig.patch
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-16 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-15 22:27 + create-arch-kconfig.patch added to -mm tree akpm
2007-11-16 1:57 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2007-11-16 2:07 ` Andrew Morton
2007-11-16 2:14 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-11-16 8:24 ` Russell King
2007-11-16 8:20 ` Russell King
2007-11-16 13:53 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-11-16 23:03 akpm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071116015730.GA16953@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).