From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:60684 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751640AbXKPIVZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Nov 2007 03:21:25 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 08:20:54 +0000 From: Russell King Subject: Re: + create-arch-kconfig.patch added to -mm tree Message-ID: <20071116082053.GA21084@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <200711152227.lAFMR5Ck019098@imap1.linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200711152227.lAFMR5Ck019098@imap1.linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravnborg.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org List-ID: On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 02:27:05PM -0800, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote: > It would be much better to do > > depends on ARCH_SUPPORTS_KPROBES > > in that generic file, and then architectures that do support it would just > have a > > bool ARCH_SUPPORTS_KPROBES > default y I thought we were discussing the prefix to use, and settling on HAVE_xxx rather than ARCH_SUPPORTS_xxx. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: