From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:60689 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751933AbXKPIYZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Nov 2007 03:24:25 -0500 Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 08:24:04 +0000 From: Russell King Subject: Re: + create-arch-kconfig.patch added to -mm tree Message-ID: <20071116082404.GB21084@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <200711152227.lAFMR5Ck019098@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <20071116015730.GA16953@Krystal> <20071115180722.8ae4b285.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071115180722.8ae4b285.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Morton Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravnborg.org List-ID: On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 06:07:22PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:57:30 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > I have an updated patchset for these 4 instrumentation menu patches, > > following Sam Ravnborg's comments (using ARCH_HAS_* instead of > > ARCH_SUPPORTS_*). I was planning to send them with my next patch round. > > > > create-arch-kconfig.patch > > add-arch_supports_oprofile.patch > > add-arch_supports_kprobes.patch > > move-kconfiginstrumentation-to-arch-kconfig-and-init-kconfig.patch > > So I've fixed all the rejects, fixed it all up for the arch/x86/Kconfig > churn, merged another patchset which depends on this one and now I'm told > that they need to be updated? Well, the discussion on linux-arch about what to use started some 11 hours before your original merge mail. Maybe you missed it? -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: