From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:37941 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757808AbYBPAVa (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:21:30 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:21:21 -0800 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) Message-Id: <20080215162121.317c7c1c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20080216000943.GD31474@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20080212120208.f7168a91.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20080216000943.GD31474@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Russell King Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:09:43 +0000 Russell King wrote: > For reference, even _I_ don't build test the entire set of ARM defconfigs - > at about 7 minutes a build, 75 defconfigs, that's about 9 hours... I > just build those which are important to myself, hope that the others are > fine, and rely on kautobuild finding any breakage. > you need a better box ;) cerfcube_defconfig: 35 seconds carmeva_defconfig: 23 seconds spitz_defconfig (one of the biggest): 45 seconds so would a stupid `for i in arch/arm/configs/*' script be sufficient coverage?