From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7][RFC] Move Marvell MBUS window handling into drivers Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 11:59:03 +0000 Message-ID: <20080316115903.GA23115@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20080307101913.GA11918@xi.wantstofly.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080307101913.GA11918-mfnYTeDhw6uOVk/H6u/4e9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: To: Lennert Buytenhek Cc: linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Saeed Bishara , Dale Farnsworth , Tzachi Perelstein , Nicolas Pitre On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 11:19:13AM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > Comments appreciated. I have no issues with this approach. Looks fine to me. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:40197 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751535AbYCPL7S (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Mar 2008 07:59:18 -0400 Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 11:59:03 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7][RFC] Move Marvell MBUS window handling into drivers Message-ID: <20080316115903.GA23115@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20080307101913.GA11918@xi.wantstofly.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080307101913.GA11918@xi.wantstofly.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Lennert Buytenhek Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Saeed Bishara , Dale Farnsworth , Tzachi Perelstein , Nicolas Pitre Message-ID: <20080316115903.sVxmuTUCMGrKX3BWkU1ip8tRs2BWKxKDxtzxiskHgqA@z> On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 11:19:13AM +0100, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > Comments appreciated. I have no issues with this approach. Looks fine to me.