From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] sparc64 ptrace: forced_successful_syscall_return() Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:42:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080319.154256.64241005.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20080319212001.2DB8526F995@magilla.localdomain> <20080319.143037.180042261.davem@davemloft.net> <20080319213610.244FC26F995@magilla.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080319213610.244FC26F995-nL1rrgvulkcB9AHHLWeGtNQXobZC6xk2@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: To: roland-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Cc: linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org From: Roland McGrath Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:36:10 -0700 (PDT) > > Acked-by: David S. Miller > > Thanks! Please follow up by taking the 7/8 and 8/8 patches as a model and > doing that one-line change to your arch_ptrace/compat_arch_ptrace functions > once the 6/8 generic patch has gone in. I didn't send those patches for other > arch's than the ones I test myself, but it's just that one line in each > function (replace {compat_,}ptrace_request call with -ENOSYS), plus the > sanity-check testing that ptrace still works. Ok. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:38465 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965601AbYCSWmm (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:42:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 15:42:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20080319.154256.64241005.davem@davemloft.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] sparc64 ptrace: forced_successful_syscall_return() From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20080319213610.244FC26F995@magilla.localdomain> References: <20080319212001.2DB8526F995@magilla.localdomain> <20080319.143037.180042261.davem@davemloft.net> <20080319213610.244FC26F995@magilla.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: roland@redhat.com Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20080319224256.ddUCuSZW1qxDFMyl_c7UtQU3wqHy_4qL2SrCGX8YtKY@z> From: Roland McGrath Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:36:10 -0700 (PDT) > > Acked-by: David S. Miller > > Thanks! Please follow up by taking the 7/8 and 8/8 patches as a model and > doing that one-line change to your arch_ptrace/compat_arch_ptrace functions > once the 6/8 generic patch has gone in. I didn't send those patches for other > arch's than the ones I test myself, but it's just that one line in each > function (replace {compat_,}ptrace_request call with -ENOSYS), plus the > sanity-check testing that ptrace still works. Ok.