From: Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
takata-TMSiXQfHlQjsTix1lMzHGQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-m32r-rQhvJZKUsGBRYuoOT4C5/9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add thread_info_cache_init() to all archs
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:19:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080413171953.bde5e9ac.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080410032354.90CB1DDF0F-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:22:56 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Some architecture need to maintain a kmem cache for thread info
> structures. (next patch adds that to powerpc to fix an alignment
> problem).
>
> There is no good arch callback to use to initialize that cache
> that I can find, so this adds a new one and adds an empty macro
> for when it's not implemented.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>
> So we have the choice here between:
>
> - the ifdef on the func name that I did, consistent with what
> I did before for iomap, which iirc Linus liked
>
> - add some more ARCH_HAS_* or HAVE_* (yuck)
>
> - add an empty definition to all archs .h (pain in the neck but I
> can do it, though it will be an annoying patch to keep around)
>
> - do a weak function (will slightly bloat everybody for no good reason)
>
> So unless there is strong complaints, I'd like to stick to my
> current approach.
>
> include/linux/sched.h | 4 ++++
> init/main.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> --- linux-work.orig/init/main.c 2008-04-10 13:11:06.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-work/init/main.c 2008-04-10 13:11:19.000000000 +1000
> @@ -623,6 +623,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void
> if (efi_enabled)
> efi_enter_virtual_mode();
> #endif
> + thread_info_cache_init();
> fork_init(num_physpages);
> proc_caches_init();
> buffer_init();
> Index: linux-work/include/linux/sched.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-work.orig/include/linux/sched.h 2008-04-10 13:11:44.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-work/include/linux/sched.h 2008-04-10 13:12:05.000000000 +1000
> @@ -1893,6 +1893,10 @@ static inline unsigned long *end_of_stac
>
> #endif
>
> +#ifndef thread_info_cache_init
> +#define thread_info_cache_init do { } while(0)
> +#endif
This trick does cause a bit of a problem: it is undefined which arch header
file is to provide the alternative definition of thread_info_cache_init.
So we can (and have) ended up in the situation where the override appears
in different files on different architectures and various screwups ensue.
So I'd suggest that we have a bigfatcomment telling implementors which file
the override should be implemented in. And make sure that this arch file is
directly included from within sched.h.
I have a suspicion that we can still get in a mess if .c files include the
per-arch file and don't include sched.h, but I forget where this happened
and why it broke stuff.
Sigh. A nice, coded-in-C implementation within each and every architecture
remains the best implementation, and all the little tricks-to-save-typing
have failure modes.
otoh, if only one .c file will ever call this function then I think that
all problems are solved by
a) moving the above ifdeffery into the .c file
b) adding a comment explaining which arch file must provide the override
c) directly including that file from within the .c file.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@ozlabs.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, takata@linux-m32r.org,
linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add thread_info_cache_init() to all archs
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:19:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080413171953.bde5e9ac.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20080414001953.l5mH2xd4RnkQHw-ECyGlipVx2OU8L53pyUK_G1vc7vo@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080410032354.90CB1DDF0F@ozlabs.org>
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:22:56 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@ozlabs.org> wrote:
> Some architecture need to maintain a kmem cache for thread info
> structures. (next patch adds that to powerpc to fix an alignment
> problem).
>
> There is no good arch callback to use to initialize that cache
> that I can find, so this adds a new one and adds an empty macro
> for when it's not implemented.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> ---
>
> So we have the choice here between:
>
> - the ifdef on the func name that I did, consistent with what
> I did before for iomap, which iirc Linus liked
>
> - add some more ARCH_HAS_* or HAVE_* (yuck)
>
> - add an empty definition to all archs .h (pain in the neck but I
> can do it, though it will be an annoying patch to keep around)
>
> - do a weak function (will slightly bloat everybody for no good reason)
>
> So unless there is strong complaints, I'd like to stick to my
> current approach.
>
> include/linux/sched.h | 4 ++++
> init/main.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> --- linux-work.orig/init/main.c 2008-04-10 13:11:06.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-work/init/main.c 2008-04-10 13:11:19.000000000 +1000
> @@ -623,6 +623,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void
> if (efi_enabled)
> efi_enter_virtual_mode();
> #endif
> + thread_info_cache_init();
> fork_init(num_physpages);
> proc_caches_init();
> buffer_init();
> Index: linux-work/include/linux/sched.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-work.orig/include/linux/sched.h 2008-04-10 13:11:44.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-work/include/linux/sched.h 2008-04-10 13:12:05.000000000 +1000
> @@ -1893,6 +1893,10 @@ static inline unsigned long *end_of_stac
>
> #endif
>
> +#ifndef thread_info_cache_init
> +#define thread_info_cache_init do { } while(0)
> +#endif
This trick does cause a bit of a problem: it is undefined which arch header
file is to provide the alternative definition of thread_info_cache_init.
So we can (and have) ended up in the situation where the override appears
in different files on different architectures and various screwups ensue.
So I'd suggest that we have a bigfatcomment telling implementors which file
the override should be implemented in. And make sure that this arch file is
directly included from within sched.h.
I have a suspicion that we can still get in a mess if .c files include the
per-arch file and don't include sched.h, but I forget where this happened
and why it broke stuff.
Sigh. A nice, coded-in-C implementation within each and every architecture
remains the best implementation, and all the little tricks-to-save-typing
have failure modes.
otoh, if only one .c file will ever call this function then I think that
all problems are solved by
a) moving the above ifdeffery into the .c file
b) adding a comment explaining which arch file must provide the override
c) directly including that file from within the .c file.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-14 0:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-10 3:22 [PATCH 1/2] Add thread_info_cache_init() to all archs Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-10 3:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
[not found] ` <20080410032354.90CB1DDF0F-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-10 21:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-10 21:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-14 0:19 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-04-14 0:19 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-14 0:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-14 0:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-14 2:13 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-14 2:13 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20080413191338.9776ebd0.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-18 3:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-18 3:58 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-18 4:19 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 4:19 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20080417211905.8ff769fa.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-18 4:38 ` Michael Ellerman
2008-04-18 4:38 ` Michael Ellerman
2008-04-18 6:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-18 6:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-05-21 17:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-05-21 17:56 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-05-21 18:41 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-21 18:41 ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-21 19:06 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-21 20:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-05-21 20:38 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-05-21 19:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-05-21 19:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-05-21 20:52 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 4:21 ` Kyle McMartin
2008-04-18 4:21 ` Kyle McMartin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-04-10 23:36 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-10 23:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080413171953.bde5e9ac.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm-de/tnxtf+jlsfhdxvbkv3wd2fqjk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=benh-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-m32r-rQhvJZKUsGBRYuoOT4C5/9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=takata-TMSiXQfHlQjsTix1lMzHGQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox