public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
	linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	takata-TMSiXQfHlQjsTix1lMzHGQ@public.gmane.org,
	linux-m32r-rQhvJZKUsGBRYuoOT4C5/9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add thread_info_cache_init() to all archs
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:19:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080413171953.bde5e9ac.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080410032354.90CB1DDF0F-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:22:56 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:

> Some architecture need to maintain a kmem cache for thread info
> structures. (next patch adds that to powerpc to fix an alignment
> problem).
> 
> There is no good arch callback to use to initialize that cache
> that I can find, so this adds a new one and adds an empty macro
> for when it's not implemented.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> 
> So we have the choice here between:
> 
>  - the ifdef on the func name that I did, consistent with what
> I did before for iomap, which iirc Linus liked
> 
>  - add some more ARCH_HAS_* or HAVE_* (yuck)
> 
>  - add an empty definition to all archs .h (pain in the neck but I
> can do it, though it will be an annoying patch to keep around)
> 
>  - do a weak function (will slightly bloat everybody for no good reason)
> 
> So unless there is strong complaints, I'd like to stick to my
> current approach.
> 
>  include/linux/sched.h |    4 ++++
>  init/main.c           |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> --- linux-work.orig/init/main.c	2008-04-10 13:11:06.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-work/init/main.c	2008-04-10 13:11:19.000000000 +1000
> @@ -623,6 +623,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void
>  	if (efi_enabled)
>  		efi_enter_virtual_mode();
>  #endif
> +	thread_info_cache_init();
>  	fork_init(num_physpages);
>  	proc_caches_init();
>  	buffer_init();
> Index: linux-work/include/linux/sched.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-work.orig/include/linux/sched.h	2008-04-10 13:11:44.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-work/include/linux/sched.h	2008-04-10 13:12:05.000000000 +1000
> @@ -1893,6 +1893,10 @@ static inline unsigned long *end_of_stac
>  
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifndef thread_info_cache_init
> +#define thread_info_cache_init	do { } while(0)
> +#endif

This trick does cause a bit of a problem: it is undefined which arch header
file is to provide the alternative definition of thread_info_cache_init.

So we can (and have) ended up in the situation where the override appears
in different files on different architectures and various screwups ensue.

So I'd suggest that we have a bigfatcomment telling implementors which file
the override should be implemented in.  And make sure that this arch file is
directly included from within sched.h.

I have a suspicion that we can still get in a mess if .c files include the
per-arch file and don't include sched.h, but I forget where this happened
and why it broke stuff.

Sigh.  A nice, coded-in-C implementation within each and every architecture
remains the best implementation, and all the little tricks-to-save-typing
have failure modes.

otoh, if only one .c file will ever call this function then I think that
all problems are solved by

a) moving the above ifdeffery into the .c file
b) adding a comment explaining which arch file must provide the override
c) directly including that file from within the .c file.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@ozlabs.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, takata@linux-m32r.org,
	linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add thread_info_cache_init() to all archs
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 17:19:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080413171953.bde5e9ac.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20080414001953.l5mH2xd4RnkQHw-ECyGlipVx2OU8L53pyUK_G1vc7vo@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080410032354.90CB1DDF0F@ozlabs.org>

On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 13:22:56 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@ozlabs.org> wrote:

> Some architecture need to maintain a kmem cache for thread info
> structures. (next patch adds that to powerpc to fix an alignment
> problem).
> 
> There is no good arch callback to use to initialize that cache
> that I can find, so this adds a new one and adds an empty macro
> for when it's not implemented.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> ---
> 
> So we have the choice here between:
> 
>  - the ifdef on the func name that I did, consistent with what
> I did before for iomap, which iirc Linus liked
> 
>  - add some more ARCH_HAS_* or HAVE_* (yuck)
> 
>  - add an empty definition to all archs .h (pain in the neck but I
> can do it, though it will be an annoying patch to keep around)
> 
>  - do a weak function (will slightly bloat everybody for no good reason)
> 
> So unless there is strong complaints, I'd like to stick to my
> current approach.
> 
>  include/linux/sched.h |    4 ++++
>  init/main.c           |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> --- linux-work.orig/init/main.c	2008-04-10 13:11:06.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-work/init/main.c	2008-04-10 13:11:19.000000000 +1000
> @@ -623,6 +623,7 @@ asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void
>  	if (efi_enabled)
>  		efi_enter_virtual_mode();
>  #endif
> +	thread_info_cache_init();
>  	fork_init(num_physpages);
>  	proc_caches_init();
>  	buffer_init();
> Index: linux-work/include/linux/sched.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-work.orig/include/linux/sched.h	2008-04-10 13:11:44.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-work/include/linux/sched.h	2008-04-10 13:12:05.000000000 +1000
> @@ -1893,6 +1893,10 @@ static inline unsigned long *end_of_stac
>  
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifndef thread_info_cache_init
> +#define thread_info_cache_init	do { } while(0)
> +#endif

This trick does cause a bit of a problem: it is undefined which arch header
file is to provide the alternative definition of thread_info_cache_init.

So we can (and have) ended up in the situation where the override appears
in different files on different architectures and various screwups ensue.

So I'd suggest that we have a bigfatcomment telling implementors which file
the override should be implemented in.  And make sure that this arch file is
directly included from within sched.h.

I have a suspicion that we can still get in a mess if .c files include the
per-arch file and don't include sched.h, but I forget where this happened
and why it broke stuff.

Sigh.  A nice, coded-in-C implementation within each and every architecture
remains the best implementation, and all the little tricks-to-save-typing
have failure modes.

otoh, if only one .c file will ever call this function then I think that
all problems are solved by

a) moving the above ifdeffery into the .c file
b) adding a comment explaining which arch file must provide the override
c) directly including that file from within the .c file.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-04-14  0:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-10  3:22 [PATCH 1/2] Add thread_info_cache_init() to all archs Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-10  3:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
     [not found] ` <20080410032354.90CB1DDF0F-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-10 21:46   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-10 21:46     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-14  0:19   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-04-14  0:19     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-14  0:38     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-14  0:38       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-14  2:13       ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-14  2:13         ` Andrew Morton
     [not found]         ` <20080413191338.9776ebd0.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-18  3:58           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-18  3:58             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-18  4:19             ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  4:19               ` Andrew Morton
     [not found]               ` <20080417211905.8ff769fa.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-18  4:38                 ` Michael Ellerman
2008-04-18  4:38                   ` Michael Ellerman
2008-04-18  6:44                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-18  6:44                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-05-21 17:56                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-05-21 17:56                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-05-21 18:41                     ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-21 18:41                       ` Andrew Morton
2008-05-21 19:06                       ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-21 20:38                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-05-21 20:38                           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-05-21 19:44                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-05-21 19:44                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-05-21 20:52                         ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  4:21             ` Kyle McMartin
2008-04-18  4:21               ` Kyle McMartin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-04-10 23:36 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-04-10 23:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080413171953.bde5e9ac.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm-de/tnxtf+jlsfhdxvbkv3wd2fqjk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=benh-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-m32r-rQhvJZKUsGBRYuoOT4C5/9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=takata-TMSiXQfHlQjsTix1lMzHGQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox