From: Andrew Morton <akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org,
torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org,
sam-uyr5N9Q2VtJg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
"Paul E. McKenney"
<paulmck-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/11] Add generic helpers for arch IPI function calls
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:11:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080425231100.b93a1601.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1208890227-24808-2-git-send-email-jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:50:17 +0200 Jens Axboe <jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This adds kernel/smp.c which contains helpers for IPI function calls. In
> addition to supporting the existing smp_call_function() in a more efficient
> manner, it also adds a more scalable variant called smp_call_function_single()
> for calling a given function on a single CPU only.
>
> The core of this is based on the x86-64 patch from Nick Piggin, lots of
> changes since then. "Alan D. Brunelle" <Alan.Brunelle-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org> has
> contributed lots of fixes and suggestions as well.
>
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> arch/Kconfig | 3 +
> include/linux/smp.h | 27 ++++-
> init/main.c | 3 +
> kernel/Makefile | 1 +
> kernel/smp.c | 366 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 398 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 kernel/smp.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
> index 694c9af..a5a0184 100644
> --- a/arch/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/Kconfig
> @@ -36,3 +36,6 @@ config HAVE_KPROBES
>
> config HAVE_KRETPROBES
> def_bool n
> +
> +config USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS
> + def_bool n
> diff --git a/include/linux/smp.h b/include/linux/smp.h
> index 55232cc..4a5418b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/smp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/smp.h
> @@ -7,9 +7,19 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
>
> extern void cpu_idle(void);
>
> +struct call_single_data {
> + struct list_head list;
> + void (*func) (void *info);
> + void *info;
> + unsigned int flags;
> +};
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>
> #include <linux/preempt.h>
> @@ -53,9 +63,23 @@ extern void smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus);
> * Call a function on all other processors
> */
> int smp_call_function(void(*func)(void *info), void *info, int retry, int wait);
> -
> +int smp_call_function_mask(cpumask_t mask, void(*func)(void *info), void *info,
> + int wait);
> int smp_call_function_single(int cpuid, void (*func) (void *info), void *info,
> int retry, int wait);
> +void __smp_call_function_single(int cpuid, struct call_single_data *data);
> +
> +/*
> + * Generic and arch helpers
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS
> +void generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt(void);
> +void generic_smp_call_function_interrupt(void);
> +void init_call_single_data(void);
> +void arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu);
> +void arch_send_call_function_ipi(cpumask_t mask);
> +extern spinlock_t call_function_lock;
> +#endif
Add a #else here ...
> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> index 833a67d..0b7578c 100644
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -773,6 +773,9 @@ static void __init do_pre_smp_initcalls(void)
> {
> extern int spawn_ksoftirqd(void);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS
> + init_call_single_data();
> +#endif
and we can lose this ifdef here.
Also, init_call_single_data() is __cpuinit but isn't declared that way.
There have been rare occasions (FRV was one) where this matters - iirc the
compiler was emitting a short-relative-addressing-form instruction which
which wasn't able to branch far enough once things were linked. We hae
this problem in eight zillion other places, of course. And it's a pita to
go adding __cpunit etc to the declaration because the compiler usually
won't tell us when it gets out of sync with reality. So we could leave he
code as-is and wait for stuff to break :(
> migration_init();
> spawn_ksoftirqd();
> if (!nosoftlockup)
> diff --git a/kernel/Makefile b/kernel/Makefile
> index 6c5f081..7e275d4 100644
> --- a/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES) += rtmutex-debug.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_RT_MUTEX_TESTER) += rtmutex-tester.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA) += dma.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += cpu.o spinlock.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS) += smp.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK) += spinlock.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) += spinlock.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_UID16) += uid16.o
> diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..a177a0d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,366 @@
> +/*
> + * Generic helpers for smp ipi calls
> + *
> + * (C) Jens Axboe <jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2008
> + *
> + */
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/percpu.h>
> +#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> +#include <linux/smp.h>
> +
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct call_single_queue, call_single_queue);
> +static LIST_HEAD(call_function_queue);
> +__cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(call_function_lock);
> +
> +enum {
> + CSD_FLAG_WAIT = 0x01,
> + CSD_FLAG_ALLOC = 0x02,
> + CSD_FLAG_FALLBACK = 0x04,
> +};
> +
> +struct call_function_data {
> + struct call_single_data csd;
> + spinlock_t lock;
> + unsigned int refs;
> + cpumask_t cpumask;
> + struct rcu_head rcu_head;
> +};
> +
> +struct call_single_queue {
> + struct list_head list;
> + spinlock_t lock;
> +};
> +
> +static struct call_function_data cfd_fallback;
> +static unsigned long cfd_fallback_used;
> +
> +void __cpuinit init_call_single_data(void)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for_each_cpu_mask(i, cpu_possible_map) {
for_each_possible_cpu()?
Do we _have_ to consider all possible CPUs here? That can be much larger
than num_online_cpus.
> + struct call_single_queue *q = &per_cpu(call_single_queue, i);
> +
> + spin_lock_init(&q->lock);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->list);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static inline void csd_flag_wait(struct call_single_data *data)
> +{
> + /* Wait for response */
> + do {
> + /*
> + * We need to see the flags store in the IPI handler
> + */
> + smp_mb();
> + if (!(data->flags & CSD_FLAG_WAIT))
> + break;
> + cpu_relax();
> + } while (1);
> +}
-ETOOLAGETOINLINE?
> +/*
> + * Insert a previously allocated call_single_data element for execution
> + * on the given CPU. data must already have ->func, ->info, and ->flags set.
> + */
> +static void generic_exec_single(int cpu, struct call_single_data *data)
> +{
> + struct call_single_queue *dst = &per_cpu(call_single_queue, cpu);
> + int wait = data->flags & CSD_FLAG_WAIT, ipi;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&dst->lock, flags);
> + ipi = list_empty(&dst->list);
> + list_add_tail(&data->list, &dst->list);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dst->lock, flags);
> +
> + if (ipi)
> + arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu);
> +
> + if (wait)
> + csd_flag_wait(data);
> +}
Is this a must-be-called-with-local-interrupts-enable function? (It
doesn't say so in the covering comment) If so, a runtime check for that
would be needed - we screw that up regularly. Ditto any other places where
this applies.
> +static void rcu_free_call_data(struct rcu_head *head)
> +{
> + struct call_function_data *cfd;
> +
> + cfd = container_of(head, struct call_function_data, rcu_head);
> + kfree(cfd);
> +}
> +
> +static void call_func_data_free(struct call_function_data *data)
> +{
> + if (data->csd.flags & CSD_FLAG_ALLOC)
> + call_rcu(&data->rcu_head, rcu_free_call_data);
> + else
> + clear_bit_unlock(0, &cfd_fallback_used);
> +}
Let's cc Mr RCU - he reviews well and often finds problems.
> +/*
> + * Invoked by arch to handle an IPI for call function. Must be called with
> + * interrupts disabled.
A runtime check would be nice. The get_cpu() will give us partial coverage
but won't detect irqs-on-inside-spinlock state.
> + */
> +void generic_smp_call_function_interrupt(void)
> +{
> + struct list_head *pos;
> + int cpu = get_cpu();
> +
> + /*
> + * It's ok to use list_for_each_rcu() here even though we may delete
> + * 'pos', since list_del_rcu() doesn't clear ->next
> + */
> + rcu_read_lock();
Sigh. irqs are disabled, so this is a waste of CPU cycles. With some of
our many RCU flavours, at least.
> + list_for_each_rcu(pos, &call_function_queue) {
> + struct call_function_data *data;
> + int refs;
> +
> + data = list_entry(pos, struct call_function_data, csd.list);
> + if (!cpu_isset(cpu, data->cpumask))
> + continue;
> +
> + data->csd.func(data->csd.info);
> +
> + spin_lock(&data->lock);
> + cpu_clear(cpu, data->cpumask);
> + WARN_ON(data->refs == 0);
> + data->refs--;
> + refs = data->refs;
> + spin_unlock(&data->lock);
> +
> + if (refs)
> + continue;
> +
> + WARN_ON(cpus_weight(data->cpumask));
!cpus_empty()
> + spin_lock(&call_function_lock);
> + list_del_rcu(&data->csd.list);
> + spin_unlock(&call_function_lock);
> +
> + if (data->csd.flags & CSD_FLAG_WAIT) {
> + smp_wmb();
It's nice to comment open-coded barriers.
> + data->csd.flags &= ~CSD_FLAG_WAIT;
> + } else
> + call_func_data_free(data);
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + put_cpu();
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Invoked by arch to handle an IPI for call function single. Must be called
> + * from the arch with interrupts disabled.
runtime check?
> + */
> +void generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt(void)
> +{
> + struct call_single_queue *q = &__get_cpu_var(call_single_queue);
> + LIST_HEAD(list);
> +
> + smp_mb();
Unclear why this is here - comment?
> + while (!list_empty(&q->list)) {
> + unsigned int data_flags;
> +
> + spin_lock(&q->lock);
> + list_replace_init(&q->list, &list);
> + spin_unlock(&q->lock);
> +
> + while (!list_empty(&list)) {
> + struct call_single_data *data;
> +
> + data = list_entry(list.next, struct call_single_data,
> + list);
> + list_del(&data->list);
> +
> + /*
> + * 'data' can be invalid after this call if
> + * flags == 0 (when called through
> + * generic_exec_single(), so save them away before
> + * making the call.
> + */
> + data_flags = data->flags;
> +
> + data->func(data->info);
> +
> + if (data_flags & CSD_FLAG_WAIT) {
> + smp_wmb();
> + data->flags &= ~CSD_FLAG_WAIT;
> + } else if (data_flags & CSD_FLAG_ALLOC)
> + kfree(data);
> + else if (data_flags & CSD_FLAG_FALLBACK)
> + clear_bit_unlock(0, &cfd_fallback_used);
> + }
> + smp_mb();
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * smp_call_function_single - Run a function on a specific CPU
> + * @func: The function to run. This must be fast and non-blocking.
> + * @info: An arbitrary pointer to pass to the function.
> + * @retry: Unused
> + * @wait: If true, wait until function has completed on other CPUs.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success, else a negative status code.
> + *
stray line here.
> + */
Some of the exported functions have kerneldoc, others do not.
> +int smp_call_function_single(int cpu, void (*func) (void *info), void *info,
> + int retry, int wait)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + /* prevent preemption and reschedule on another processor */
> + int me = get_cpu();
> +
> + /* Can deadlock when called with interrupts disabled */
> + WARN_ON(wait && irqs_disabled());
Perhaps that addresses above comments?
> + if (cpu == me) {
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> + func(info);
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> + } else {
> + struct call_single_data *data;
> +
> + if (wait) {
> + struct call_single_data d;
> +
> + data = &d;
> + data->flags = CSD_FLAG_WAIT;
> + } else {
> + data = kmalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_ATOMIC);
> + if (data)
> + data->flags = CSD_FLAG_ALLOC;
> + else {
> + while (test_and_set_bit_lock(0,
> + &cfd_fallback_used))
cfd_fallback_used is rather mysterious - it could do with a comment at its
definition site. I'm wondering if we should/could be doing bit_spin_lock
on it. But if we did that, it could just be a spinlock.
> + cpu_relax();
> +
> + data = &cfd_fallback.csd;
> + data->flags = CSD_FLAG_FALLBACK;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + data->func = func;
> + data->info = info;
> + generic_exec_single(cpu, data);
> + }
> +
> + put_cpu();
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_call_function_single);
> +
> +/**
> + * __smp_call_function_single(): Run a function on another CPU
> + * @cpu: The CPU to run on.
> + * @data: Pre-allocated and setup data structure
> + *
> + * Like smp_call_function_single(), but allow caller to pass in a pre-allocated
> + * data structure. Useful for embedding @data inside other structures, for
> + * instance.
> + *
> + */
> +void __smp_call_function_single(int cpu, struct call_single_data *data)
> +{
> + generic_exec_single(cpu, data);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * smp_call_function_mask(): Run a function on a set of other CPUs.
> + * @mask: The set of cpus to run on.
> + * @func: The function to run. This must be fast and non-blocking.
> + * @info: An arbitrary pointer to pass to the function.
> + * @wait: If true, wait (atomically) until function has completed on other CPUs.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success, else a negative status code.
> + *
> + * If @wait is true, then returns once @func has returned.
> + *
> + * You must not call this function with disabled interrupts or from a
> + * hardware interrupt handler or from a bottom half handler.
> + */
> +int smp_call_function_mask(cpumask_t mask, void (*func)(void *), void *info,
> + int wait)
> +{
> + struct call_function_data *data;
> + cpumask_t allbutself;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int num_cpus;
> +
> + /* Can deadlock when called with interrupts disabled */
> + WARN_ON(wait && irqs_disabled());
Ditto
> + allbutself = cpu_online_map;
> + cpu_clear(smp_processor_id(), allbutself);
> + cpus_and(mask, mask, allbutself);
> + num_cpus = cpus_weight(mask);
> +
> + if (!num_cpus)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (wait) {
> + struct call_function_data d;
> +
> + data = &d;
> + data->csd.flags = CSD_FLAG_WAIT;
> + } else {
> + data = kmalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_ATOMIC);
> + if (data)
> + data->csd.flags = CSD_FLAG_ALLOC;
> + else {
> + while (test_and_set_bit_lock(0, &cfd_fallback_used))
> + cpu_relax();
> +
> + data = &cfd_fallback;
> + data->csd.flags = CSD_FLAG_FALLBACK;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + spin_lock_init(&data->lock);
> + data->csd.func = func;
> + data->csd.info = info;
> + data->refs = num_cpus;
> + data->cpumask = mask;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&call_function_lock, flags);
> + list_add_tail_rcu(&data->csd.list, &call_function_queue);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&call_function_lock, flags);
> +
> + /* Send a message to all CPUs in the map */
> + arch_send_call_function_ipi(mask);
> +
> + /* optionally wait for the CPUs to complete */
> + if (wait)
> + csd_flag_wait(&data->csd);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_call_function_mask);
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
npiggin@suse.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
peterz@infradead.org, sam@ravnborg.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/11] Add generic helpers for arch IPI function calls
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 23:11:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080425231100.b93a1601.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20080426061100.aq9pvP6Ou9ikRC7gYDL3iZ3_8OKLD8dajIANXfFKghA@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1208890227-24808-2-git-send-email-jens.axboe@oracle.com>
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:50:17 +0200 Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:
> This adds kernel/smp.c which contains helpers for IPI function calls. In
> addition to supporting the existing smp_call_function() in a more efficient
> manner, it also adds a more scalable variant called smp_call_function_single()
> for calling a given function on a single CPU only.
>
> The core of this is based on the x86-64 patch from Nick Piggin, lots of
> changes since then. "Alan D. Brunelle" <Alan.Brunelle@hp.com> has
> contributed lots of fixes and suggestions as well.
>
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
> ---
> arch/Kconfig | 3 +
> include/linux/smp.h | 27 ++++-
> init/main.c | 3 +
> kernel/Makefile | 1 +
> kernel/smp.c | 366 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 398 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 kernel/smp.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
> index 694c9af..a5a0184 100644
> --- a/arch/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/Kconfig
> @@ -36,3 +36,6 @@ config HAVE_KPROBES
>
> config HAVE_KRETPROBES
> def_bool n
> +
> +config USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS
> + def_bool n
> diff --git a/include/linux/smp.h b/include/linux/smp.h
> index 55232cc..4a5418b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/smp.h
> +++ b/include/linux/smp.h
> @@ -7,9 +7,19 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/list.h>
> +#include <linux/spinlock.h>
> +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
>
> extern void cpu_idle(void);
>
> +struct call_single_data {
> + struct list_head list;
> + void (*func) (void *info);
> + void *info;
> + unsigned int flags;
> +};
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>
> #include <linux/preempt.h>
> @@ -53,9 +63,23 @@ extern void smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus);
> * Call a function on all other processors
> */
> int smp_call_function(void(*func)(void *info), void *info, int retry, int wait);
> -
> +int smp_call_function_mask(cpumask_t mask, void(*func)(void *info), void *info,
> + int wait);
> int smp_call_function_single(int cpuid, void (*func) (void *info), void *info,
> int retry, int wait);
> +void __smp_call_function_single(int cpuid, struct call_single_data *data);
> +
> +/*
> + * Generic and arch helpers
> + */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS
> +void generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt(void);
> +void generic_smp_call_function_interrupt(void);
> +void init_call_single_data(void);
> +void arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu);
> +void arch_send_call_function_ipi(cpumask_t mask);
> +extern spinlock_t call_function_lock;
> +#endif
Add a #else here ...
> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> index 833a67d..0b7578c 100644
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -773,6 +773,9 @@ static void __init do_pre_smp_initcalls(void)
> {
> extern int spawn_ksoftirqd(void);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS
> + init_call_single_data();
> +#endif
and we can lose this ifdef here.
Also, init_call_single_data() is __cpuinit but isn't declared that way.
There have been rare occasions (FRV was one) where this matters - iirc the
compiler was emitting a short-relative-addressing-form instruction which
which wasn't able to branch far enough once things were linked. We hae
this problem in eight zillion other places, of course. And it's a pita to
go adding __cpunit etc to the declaration because the compiler usually
won't tell us when it gets out of sync with reality. So we could leave he
code as-is and wait for stuff to break :(
> migration_init();
> spawn_ksoftirqd();
> if (!nosoftlockup)
> diff --git a/kernel/Makefile b/kernel/Makefile
> index 6c5f081..7e275d4 100644
> --- a/kernel/Makefile
> +++ b/kernel/Makefile
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES) += rtmutex-debug.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_RT_MUTEX_TESTER) += rtmutex-tester.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA) += dma.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += cpu.o spinlock.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_USE_GENERIC_SMP_HELPERS) += smp.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK) += spinlock.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING) += spinlock.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_UID16) += uid16.o
> diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..a177a0d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,366 @@
> +/*
> + * Generic helpers for smp ipi calls
> + *
> + * (C) Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> 2008
> + *
> + */
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/percpu.h>
> +#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
> +#include <linux/smp.h>
> +
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct call_single_queue, call_single_queue);
> +static LIST_HEAD(call_function_queue);
> +__cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(call_function_lock);
> +
> +enum {
> + CSD_FLAG_WAIT = 0x01,
> + CSD_FLAG_ALLOC = 0x02,
> + CSD_FLAG_FALLBACK = 0x04,
> +};
> +
> +struct call_function_data {
> + struct call_single_data csd;
> + spinlock_t lock;
> + unsigned int refs;
> + cpumask_t cpumask;
> + struct rcu_head rcu_head;
> +};
> +
> +struct call_single_queue {
> + struct list_head list;
> + spinlock_t lock;
> +};
> +
> +static struct call_function_data cfd_fallback;
> +static unsigned long cfd_fallback_used;
> +
> +void __cpuinit init_call_single_data(void)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for_each_cpu_mask(i, cpu_possible_map) {
for_each_possible_cpu()?
Do we _have_ to consider all possible CPUs here? That can be much larger
than num_online_cpus.
> + struct call_single_queue *q = &per_cpu(call_single_queue, i);
> +
> + spin_lock_init(&q->lock);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&q->list);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static inline void csd_flag_wait(struct call_single_data *data)
> +{
> + /* Wait for response */
> + do {
> + /*
> + * We need to see the flags store in the IPI handler
> + */
> + smp_mb();
> + if (!(data->flags & CSD_FLAG_WAIT))
> + break;
> + cpu_relax();
> + } while (1);
> +}
-ETOOLAGETOINLINE?
> +/*
> + * Insert a previously allocated call_single_data element for execution
> + * on the given CPU. data must already have ->func, ->info, and ->flags set.
> + */
> +static void generic_exec_single(int cpu, struct call_single_data *data)
> +{
> + struct call_single_queue *dst = &per_cpu(call_single_queue, cpu);
> + int wait = data->flags & CSD_FLAG_WAIT, ipi;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&dst->lock, flags);
> + ipi = list_empty(&dst->list);
> + list_add_tail(&data->list, &dst->list);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dst->lock, flags);
> +
> + if (ipi)
> + arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu);
> +
> + if (wait)
> + csd_flag_wait(data);
> +}
Is this a must-be-called-with-local-interrupts-enable function? (It
doesn't say so in the covering comment) If so, a runtime check for that
would be needed - we screw that up regularly. Ditto any other places where
this applies.
> +static void rcu_free_call_data(struct rcu_head *head)
> +{
> + struct call_function_data *cfd;
> +
> + cfd = container_of(head, struct call_function_data, rcu_head);
> + kfree(cfd);
> +}
> +
> +static void call_func_data_free(struct call_function_data *data)
> +{
> + if (data->csd.flags & CSD_FLAG_ALLOC)
> + call_rcu(&data->rcu_head, rcu_free_call_data);
> + else
> + clear_bit_unlock(0, &cfd_fallback_used);
> +}
Let's cc Mr RCU - he reviews well and often finds problems.
> +/*
> + * Invoked by arch to handle an IPI for call function. Must be called with
> + * interrupts disabled.
A runtime check would be nice. The get_cpu() will give us partial coverage
but won't detect irqs-on-inside-spinlock state.
> + */
> +void generic_smp_call_function_interrupt(void)
> +{
> + struct list_head *pos;
> + int cpu = get_cpu();
> +
> + /*
> + * It's ok to use list_for_each_rcu() here even though we may delete
> + * 'pos', since list_del_rcu() doesn't clear ->next
> + */
> + rcu_read_lock();
Sigh. irqs are disabled, so this is a waste of CPU cycles. With some of
our many RCU flavours, at least.
> + list_for_each_rcu(pos, &call_function_queue) {
> + struct call_function_data *data;
> + int refs;
> +
> + data = list_entry(pos, struct call_function_data, csd.list);
> + if (!cpu_isset(cpu, data->cpumask))
> + continue;
> +
> + data->csd.func(data->csd.info);
> +
> + spin_lock(&data->lock);
> + cpu_clear(cpu, data->cpumask);
> + WARN_ON(data->refs == 0);
> + data->refs--;
> + refs = data->refs;
> + spin_unlock(&data->lock);
> +
> + if (refs)
> + continue;
> +
> + WARN_ON(cpus_weight(data->cpumask));
!cpus_empty()
> + spin_lock(&call_function_lock);
> + list_del_rcu(&data->csd.list);
> + spin_unlock(&call_function_lock);
> +
> + if (data->csd.flags & CSD_FLAG_WAIT) {
> + smp_wmb();
It's nice to comment open-coded barriers.
> + data->csd.flags &= ~CSD_FLAG_WAIT;
> + } else
> + call_func_data_free(data);
> + }
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> + put_cpu();
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Invoked by arch to handle an IPI for call function single. Must be called
> + * from the arch with interrupts disabled.
runtime check?
> + */
> +void generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt(void)
> +{
> + struct call_single_queue *q = &__get_cpu_var(call_single_queue);
> + LIST_HEAD(list);
> +
> + smp_mb();
Unclear why this is here - comment?
> + while (!list_empty(&q->list)) {
> + unsigned int data_flags;
> +
> + spin_lock(&q->lock);
> + list_replace_init(&q->list, &list);
> + spin_unlock(&q->lock);
> +
> + while (!list_empty(&list)) {
> + struct call_single_data *data;
> +
> + data = list_entry(list.next, struct call_single_data,
> + list);
> + list_del(&data->list);
> +
> + /*
> + * 'data' can be invalid after this call if
> + * flags == 0 (when called through
> + * generic_exec_single(), so save them away before
> + * making the call.
> + */
> + data_flags = data->flags;
> +
> + data->func(data->info);
> +
> + if (data_flags & CSD_FLAG_WAIT) {
> + smp_wmb();
> + data->flags &= ~CSD_FLAG_WAIT;
> + } else if (data_flags & CSD_FLAG_ALLOC)
> + kfree(data);
> + else if (data_flags & CSD_FLAG_FALLBACK)
> + clear_bit_unlock(0, &cfd_fallback_used);
> + }
> + smp_mb();
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * smp_call_function_single - Run a function on a specific CPU
> + * @func: The function to run. This must be fast and non-blocking.
> + * @info: An arbitrary pointer to pass to the function.
> + * @retry: Unused
> + * @wait: If true, wait until function has completed on other CPUs.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success, else a negative status code.
> + *
stray line here.
> + */
Some of the exported functions have kerneldoc, others do not.
> +int smp_call_function_single(int cpu, void (*func) (void *info), void *info,
> + int retry, int wait)
> +{
> + unsigned long flags;
> + /* prevent preemption and reschedule on another processor */
> + int me = get_cpu();
> +
> + /* Can deadlock when called with interrupts disabled */
> + WARN_ON(wait && irqs_disabled());
Perhaps that addresses above comments?
> + if (cpu == me) {
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> + func(info);
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> + } else {
> + struct call_single_data *data;
> +
> + if (wait) {
> + struct call_single_data d;
> +
> + data = &d;
> + data->flags = CSD_FLAG_WAIT;
> + } else {
> + data = kmalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_ATOMIC);
> + if (data)
> + data->flags = CSD_FLAG_ALLOC;
> + else {
> + while (test_and_set_bit_lock(0,
> + &cfd_fallback_used))
cfd_fallback_used is rather mysterious - it could do with a comment at its
definition site. I'm wondering if we should/could be doing bit_spin_lock
on it. But if we did that, it could just be a spinlock.
> + cpu_relax();
> +
> + data = &cfd_fallback.csd;
> + data->flags = CSD_FLAG_FALLBACK;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + data->func = func;
> + data->info = info;
> + generic_exec_single(cpu, data);
> + }
> +
> + put_cpu();
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_call_function_single);
> +
> +/**
> + * __smp_call_function_single(): Run a function on another CPU
> + * @cpu: The CPU to run on.
> + * @data: Pre-allocated and setup data structure
> + *
> + * Like smp_call_function_single(), but allow caller to pass in a pre-allocated
> + * data structure. Useful for embedding @data inside other structures, for
> + * instance.
> + *
> + */
> +void __smp_call_function_single(int cpu, struct call_single_data *data)
> +{
> + generic_exec_single(cpu, data);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * smp_call_function_mask(): Run a function on a set of other CPUs.
> + * @mask: The set of cpus to run on.
> + * @func: The function to run. This must be fast and non-blocking.
> + * @info: An arbitrary pointer to pass to the function.
> + * @wait: If true, wait (atomically) until function has completed on other CPUs.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success, else a negative status code.
> + *
> + * If @wait is true, then returns once @func has returned.
> + *
> + * You must not call this function with disabled interrupts or from a
> + * hardware interrupt handler or from a bottom half handler.
> + */
> +int smp_call_function_mask(cpumask_t mask, void (*func)(void *), void *info,
> + int wait)
> +{
> + struct call_function_data *data;
> + cpumask_t allbutself;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int num_cpus;
> +
> + /* Can deadlock when called with interrupts disabled */
> + WARN_ON(wait && irqs_disabled());
Ditto
> + allbutself = cpu_online_map;
> + cpu_clear(smp_processor_id(), allbutself);
> + cpus_and(mask, mask, allbutself);
> + num_cpus = cpus_weight(mask);
> +
> + if (!num_cpus)
> + return 0;
> +
> + if (wait) {
> + struct call_function_data d;
> +
> + data = &d;
> + data->csd.flags = CSD_FLAG_WAIT;
> + } else {
> + data = kmalloc(sizeof(*data), GFP_ATOMIC);
> + if (data)
> + data->csd.flags = CSD_FLAG_ALLOC;
> + else {
> + while (test_and_set_bit_lock(0, &cfd_fallback_used))
> + cpu_relax();
> +
> + data = &cfd_fallback;
> + data->csd.flags = CSD_FLAG_FALLBACK;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + spin_lock_init(&data->lock);
> + data->csd.func = func;
> + data->csd.info = info;
> + data->refs = num_cpus;
> + data->cpumask = mask;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&call_function_lock, flags);
> + list_add_tail_rcu(&data->csd.list, &call_function_queue);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&call_function_lock, flags);
> +
> + /* Send a message to all CPUs in the map */
> + arch_send_call_function_ipi(mask);
> +
> + /* optionally wait for the CPUs to complete */
> + if (wait)
> + csd_flag_wait(&data->csd);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(smp_call_function_mask);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-26 6:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 169+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-22 18:50 [PATCH 0/11] Generic smp_call_function() #2 Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 18:50 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <1208890227-24808-1-git-send-email-jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-22 18:50 ` [PATCH 1/11] Add generic helpers for arch IPI function calls Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 18:50 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <1208890227-24808-2-git-send-email-jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-22 20:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-22 20:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-23 6:07 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-23 6:07 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <20080423060725.GT12774-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-23 6:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-23 6:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-23 7:49 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-23 7:49 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <20080423074933.GB12774-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-23 7:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-23 7:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-24 22:01 ` Russell King
2008-04-24 22:01 ` Russell King
[not found] ` <20080424220157.GA26179-f404yB8NqCZvn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-25 7:18 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-25 7:18 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <20080425071823.GF12774-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-26 6:28 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-04-26 6:28 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
[not found] ` <4812CB99.1070600-TSDbQ3PG+2Y@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-28 7:38 ` Jes Sorensen
2008-04-28 7:38 ` Jes Sorensen
2008-04-26 6:11 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-04-26 6:11 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20080425231100.b93a1601.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-26 14:13 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-26 14:13 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-27 0:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-04-27 0:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
[not found] ` <20080427005816.GB21687-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-27 10:36 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-27 10:36 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-27 10:30 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-27 10:30 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <1209219236.3113.6.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-28 14:25 ` David Howells
2008-04-28 14:25 ` David Howells
[not found] ` <18470.1209392727-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-28 14:43 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-28 14:43 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-22 18:50 ` [PATCH 2/11] x86: convert to generic helpers for " Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 18:50 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 19:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-22 19:03 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.1.10.0804221157220.2779-5CScLwifNT1QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-22 19:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-22 19:12 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <20080422191213.GA6370-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-22 19:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-22 19:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-22 19:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-22 19:26 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <20080422192601.GB12588-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-22 19:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-22 19:50 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.1.10.0804221244350.2779-5CScLwifNT1QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-23 1:11 ` Nick Piggin
2008-04-23 1:11 ` Nick Piggin
[not found] ` <20080423011153.GB17572-B4tOwbsTzaBolqkO4TVVkw@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-23 1:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-23 1:22 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.1.10.0804221817050.2779-5CScLwifNT1QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-23 1:36 ` Nick Piggin
2008-04-23 1:36 ` Nick Piggin
2008-04-23 7:08 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-23 7:08 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-23 12:54 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-23 12:54 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <1208890227-24808-3-git-send-email-jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-26 6:44 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-04-26 6:44 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
[not found] ` <4812CF5B.4080902-TSDbQ3PG+2Y@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-27 10:23 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-27 10:23 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <20080427102335.GS12774-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-27 15:18 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-04-27 15:18 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-04-22 18:50 ` [PATCH 3/11] powerpc: " Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 18:50 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 18:50 ` [PATCH 4/11] ia64: " Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 18:50 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 18:50 ` [PATCH 5/11] alpha: " Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 18:50 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 18:50 ` [PATCH 6/11] arm: " Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 18:50 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 18:50 ` [PATCH 7/11] m32r: " Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 18:50 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 18:50 ` [PATCH 8/11] mips: " Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 18:50 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 23:18 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-04-22 23:18 ` Ralf Baechle
2008-04-23 7:18 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-23 7:18 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 18:50 ` [PATCH 9/11] parisc: " Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 18:50 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 18:50 ` [PATCH 10/11] sh: " Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 18:50 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <1208890227-24808-11-git-send-email-jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-25 8:56 ` Paul Mundt
2008-04-25 8:56 ` Paul Mundt
[not found] ` <20080425085637.GA30569-M7jkjyW5wf5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-25 9:16 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-25 9:16 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 18:50 ` [PATCH 11/11] s390: " Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 18:50 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <1208890227-24808-12-git-send-email-jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-23 7:58 ` Heiko Carstens
2008-04-23 7:58 ` Heiko Carstens
[not found] ` <20080423075831.GB15850-Pmgahw53EmNLmI7Nx2oIsGnsbthNF6/HVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-23 8:11 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-23 8:11 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <20080423081147.GC12774-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-23 11:21 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-23 11:21 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <20080423112124.GJ12774-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-23 11:47 ` Heiko Carstens
2008-04-23 11:47 ` Heiko Carstens
[not found] ` <20080423114744.GA29422-Pmgahw53EmNLmI7Nx2oIsGnsbthNF6/HVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-23 11:54 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-23 11:54 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-23 12:42 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2008-04-23 12:42 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2008-04-23 15:56 ` Rusty Russell
2008-04-23 15:56 ` Rusty Russell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-04-22 7:57 [PATCH 0/11] Generic smp_call_function() and friends Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <1208851058-8500-1-git-send-email-jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-22 7:57 ` [PATCH 1/11] Add generic helpers for arch IPI function calls Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 7:57 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <1208851058-8500-2-git-send-email-jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-22 9:16 ` Avi Kivity
2008-04-22 9:16 ` Avi Kivity
[not found] ` <480DACDD.7040108-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-22 9:22 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 9:22 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <20080422092230.GW12774-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-22 11:14 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 11:14 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 13:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-22 13:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-22 14:25 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 14:25 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <20080422142543.GG12774-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-22 14:38 ` Avi Kivity
2008-04-22 14:38 ` Avi Kivity
[not found] ` <480DF861.6000705-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-22 14:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-22 14:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-04-22 14:47 ` Avi Kivity
2008-04-22 14:47 ` Avi Kivity
2008-04-22 14:53 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 14:53 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 14:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-22 14:43 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.1.10.0804220735350.2779-5CScLwifNT1QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-22 14:51 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 14:51 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 15:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-22 15:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-22 16:49 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 16:49 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <20080422164947.GN12774-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-22 17:04 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 17:04 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <20080422170405.GO12774-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-22 17:13 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 17:13 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <20080422171324.GP12774-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-22 17:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-22 17:29 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.1.10.0804221027210.2779-5CScLwifNT1QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-22 18:23 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 18:23 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <20080422182337.GQ12774-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-22 18:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-22 18:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-22 14:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-04-22 14:58 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.1.10.0804220749450.2779-5CScLwifNT1QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-22 15:07 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 15:07 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-22 23:12 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-22 23:12 ` Mark Lord
[not found] ` <480E70ED.3030701-gsilrlXbHYg@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-23 7:24 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-23 7:24 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <20080423072432.GX12774-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-23 13:42 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-23 13:42 ` Mark Lord
[not found] ` <480F3CBC.60305-gsilrlXbHYg@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-23 13:51 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-23 13:51 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-23 14:46 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-23 14:46 ` Mark Lord
[not found] ` <480F4BD9.8090003-gsilrlXbHYg@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-24 10:59 ` Jens Axboe
2008-04-24 10:59 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <20080424105908.GW12774-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-24 12:44 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-24 12:44 ` Mark Lord
[not found] ` <481080A0.9050804-gsilrlXbHYg@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-24 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-24 21:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-04-25 11:08 ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-25 11:08 ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-26 8:04 ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-26 8:04 ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-28 15:13 ` Mark Lord
2008-04-28 15:13 ` Mark Lord
2008-05-01 16:23 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080425231100.b93a1601.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm-de/tnxtf+jlsfhdxvbkv3wd2fqjk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=paulmck-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=peterz-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sam-uyr5N9Q2VtJg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=torvalds-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).