From: Wolfgang Denk <wd-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add fast little-endian switch system call
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:40:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080429184047.47CB7247B4@gemini.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:46:08 +1000." <18454.35824.527711.355488-UYQwCShxghk5kJ7NmlRacFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
In message <18454.35824.527711.355488-UYQwCShxghk5kJ7NmlRacFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> you wrote:
>
> > Am I missing something here or does this add a branch for every normal
> > syscall?
>
> It does, but the impact is so small as to be unmeasurable with
> lmbench, even on the null syscall measurement. The overhead of the
> easily-predicted not-taken branch is completely swamped by the amount
> of time that the sc and rfid instructions take. I had it under a
> config option at one point but then decided not to bother with that
> when I couldn't measure any difference.
This probably depends a bit on the performance of the system in
question. Did you measure it - for example - on a 50 MHz MPC850 ?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org
To get something done, a committee should consist of no more than
three men, two of them absent.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
mtk.manpages@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add fast little-endian switch system call
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:40:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080429184047.47CB7247B4@gemini.denx.de> (raw)
Message-ID: <20080429184047.jjf_JtgSUXLq9taXeqnoobsB82Ozd16ZJEjAZG3aeeA@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 29 Apr 2008 12:46:08 +1000." <18454.35824.527711.355488@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
In message <18454.35824.527711.355488@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> you wrote:
>
> > Am I missing something here or does this add a branch for every normal
> > syscall?
>
> It does, but the impact is so small as to be unmeasurable with
> lmbench, even on the null syscall measurement. The overhead of the
> easily-predicted not-taken branch is completely swamped by the amount
> of time that the sc and rfid instructions take. I had it under a
> config option at one point but then decided not to bother with that
> when I couldn't measure any difference.
This probably depends a bit on the performance of the system in
question. Did you measure it - for example - on a 50 MHz MPC850 ?
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd@denx.de
To get something done, a committee should consist of no more than
three men, two of them absent.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-29 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <18453.18943.906693.409245@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <18453.18943.906693.409245-UYQwCShxghk5kJ7NmlRacFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-28 14:43 ` [PATCH] Add fast little-endian switch system call Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-28 14:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20080428144332.GA17109-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-28 15:42 ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-04-28 15:42 ` Michael Kerrisk
2008-04-29 2:46 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-04-29 2:46 ` Paul Mackerras
[not found] ` <18454.35824.527711.355488-UYQwCShxghk5kJ7NmlRacFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-29 18:40 ` Wolfgang Denk [this message]
2008-04-29 18:40 ` Wolfgang Denk
[not found] ` <20080429184047.47CB7247B4-C2Gvrrd9BC/j/ljBK/0BTg@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-29 18:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-29 18:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-04-29 21:16 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-04-29 21:16 ` Paul Mackerras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080429184047.47CB7247B4@gemini.denx.de \
--to=wd-ynqeqjnshbs@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=paulus-eUNUBHrolfbYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox