From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add fast little-endian switch system call Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:46:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20080429184623.GA23654@lst.de> References: <18454.35824.527711.355488@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20080429184047.47CB7247B4@gemini.denx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080429184047.47CB7247B4-C2Gvrrd9BC/j/ljBK/0BTg@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: To: Wolfgang Denk Cc: Paul Mackerras , Christoph Hellwig , linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linuxppc-dev-mnsaURCQ41sdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 08:40:47PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > This probably depends a bit on the performance of the system in > question. Did you measure it - for example - on a 50 MHz MPC850 ? You got a 64bit kernel to run on a MPC850? wow :) Not sure what the slowest supported 64bit cpu is (RS64-II?), but Paul might be right and in this case it really doesn't matter. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:57153 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757633AbYD2Sqj (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:46:39 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 20:46:23 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add fast little-endian switch system call Message-ID: <20080429184623.GA23654@lst.de> References: <18454.35824.527711.355488@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20080429184047.47CB7247B4@gemini.denx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080429184047.47CB7247B4@gemini.denx.de> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Wolfgang Denk Cc: Paul Mackerras , Christoph Hellwig , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, mtk.manpages@gmail.com Message-ID: <20080429184623.2yfRyHKydSGReSiFftGJ1QpzNd8N8VZpmb3DOT2OdR0@z> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 08:40:47PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > This probably depends a bit on the performance of the system in > question. Did you measure it - for example - on a 50 MHz MPC850 ? You got a 64bit kernel to run on a MPC850? wow :) Not sure what the slowest supported 64bit cpu is (RS64-II?), but Paul might be right and in this case it really doesn't matter.