From: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@mailshack.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
heukelum@fastmail.fm
Subject: [PATCH] Make for_each_cpu_mask a bit smaller
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 15:50:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080511135039.GA3286@mailshack.com> (raw)
The for_each_cpu_mask loop is used quite often in the kernel. It
makes use of two functions: first_cpu and next_cpu. This patch
changes for_each_cpu_mask to use only one function: a newly
introduced find_next_cpu. Each use of the for_each_cpu_mask
constuct then becomes a few bytes smaller. An x86_64 defconfig
kernel is about 2000 bytes smaller with this patch applied:
text data bss dec hex filename
5395732 976736 734280 7106748 6c70bc vmlinux.orig
5393639 976736 734280 7104655 6c688f vmlinux
Runs fine on qemu UP/SMP x86_64/i386.
Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
---
Hello Andrew,
Could you add this patch to -mm?
Greetings,
Alexander
include/linux/cpumask.h | 14 ++++++++------
lib/cpumask.c | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
index 9650806..a760e29 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -221,9 +221,11 @@ int __first_cpu(const cpumask_t *srcp);
#define first_cpu(src) __first_cpu(&(src))
int __next_cpu(int n, const cpumask_t *srcp);
#define next_cpu(n, src) __next_cpu((n), &(src))
+int find_next_cpu_mask(int n, const cpumask_t *srcp);
#else
-#define first_cpu(src) ({ (void)(src); 0; })
-#define next_cpu(n, src) ({ (void)(src); 1; })
+#define first_cpu(src) ({ (void)(src); 0; })
+#define next_cpu(n, src) ({ (void)(src); 1; })
+#define find_next_cpu_mask(n, src) ({ (void)(src); n; })
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_CPUMASK_OF_CPU_MAP
@@ -351,10 +353,10 @@ static inline void __cpus_fold(cpumask_t *dstp, const cpumask_t *origp,
}
#if NR_CPUS > 1
-#define for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, mask) \
- for ((cpu) = first_cpu(mask); \
- (cpu) < NR_CPUS; \
- (cpu) = next_cpu((cpu), (mask)))
+#define for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, mask) \
+ for ((cpu) = 0; \
+ (cpu) = find_next_cpu_mask((cpu), &(mask)), \
+ (cpu) < NR_CPUS; (cpu)++)
#else /* NR_CPUS == 1 */
#define for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, mask) \
for ((cpu) = 0; (cpu) < 1; (cpu)++, (void)mask)
diff --git a/lib/cpumask.c b/lib/cpumask.c
index bb4f76d..93dd6ca 100644
--- a/lib/cpumask.c
+++ b/lib/cpumask.c
@@ -15,6 +15,12 @@ int __next_cpu(int n, const cpumask_t *srcp)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__next_cpu);
+int find_next_cpu_mask(int n, const cpumask_t *srcp)
+{
+ return find_next_bit(srcp->bits, NR_CPUS, n);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(find_next_cpu_mask);
+
int __any_online_cpu(const cpumask_t *mask)
{
int cpu;
next reply other threads:[~2008-05-11 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-11 13:50 Alexander van Heukelum [this message]
2008-05-11 13:50 ` [PATCH] Make for_each_cpu_mask a bit smaller Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-11 13:57 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-11 14:14 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-11 16:06 ` [RFC/PATCH] Make for_each_node_mask out-of-line Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-11 21:01 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-12 12:04 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-12 16:45 ` Mike Travis
2008-05-12 19:00 ` [PATCHv2] Make for_each_cpu_mask a bit smaller Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-12 21:45 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-05-13 9:28 ` [PATCHv3] " Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-13 12:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-11 15:24 ` [PATCH] " Matthew Wilcox
2008-05-11 16:19 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-11 16:19 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-11 22:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-05-12 11:04 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-12 11:04 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-12 11:56 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080511135039.GA3286@mailshack.com \
--to=heukelum@mailshack.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=heukelum@fastmail.fm \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox