From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King Subject: Re: Remove last reminants of dyntick support Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 17:31:29 +0100 Message-ID: <20080512163129.GA25110@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20080511221719.GO1645@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:37661 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753330AbYELQbr (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2008 12:31:47 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080511221719.GO1645@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Adrian Bunk Cc: LKML , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, LAK On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 01:17:19AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 10:56:00PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > > From: Russell King > > > > Neither S390 nor SH have the configuration option for NO_IDLE_HZ > > in their Kconfig files, yet their defconfig files lists them. > > Remove those references. > >... > > I'm not a fan of touching defconfig files this way - this easily leads > to patch conflicts without any real advantage. That only becomes a problem if the defconfigs are regularly touched. If we do find that there's conflicts, I'll drop them. Actually, I'll move them into separate commits now, so if a conflict occurs it's just a case of removing the offending commit. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: