From: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@mailshack.com>
To: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
ARCH <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
Subject: [PATCHv2] Make for_each_cpu_mask a bit smaller
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 21:00:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080512190039.GA13324@mailshack.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4828741B.2080802@sgi.com>
The for_each_cpu_mask loop is used quite often in the kernel. It
makes use of two functions: first_cpu and next_cpu. This patch
changes for_each_cpu_mask to use only the latter. Because next_cpu
finds the next eligible cpu _after_ the given one, the iteration
variable has to be initialized to -1 and next_cpu has to be
called with this value before the first iteration. An x86_64
defconfig kernel (from sched/latest) is about 2500 bytes smaller
with this patch applied:
text data bss dec hex filename
6222517 917952 749932 7890401 7865e1 vmlinux.orig
6219922 917952 749932 7887806 785bbe vmlinux
The same size reduction is seen for defconfig+MAXSMP
text data bss dec hex filename
6241772 2563968 1492716 10298456 9d2458 vmlinux.orig
6239211 2563968 1492716 10295895 9d1a57 vmlinux
Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
---
Hello Mike, Ingo,
Here is a version of the for_each_cpu_mask change that applies on
top of sched/latest. I think it is non-intrusive enough to put
it in sched/latest?
This version reuses the already-existing api next_cpu instead
of inventing a new one; initializing the iteration counter to
-1 was suggested by Matthew Wilcox.
Greetings,
Alexander
include/linux/cpumask.h | 16 ++++++++--------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
index 73434e5..74b748b 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -377,10 +377,10 @@ int __any_online_cpu(const cpumask_t *mask);
#define first_cpu(src) __first_cpu(&(src))
#define next_cpu(n, src) __next_cpu((n), &(src))
#define any_online_cpu(mask) __any_online_cpu(&(mask))
-#define for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, mask) \
- for ((cpu) = first_cpu(mask); \
- (cpu) < NR_CPUS; \
- (cpu) = next_cpu((cpu), (mask)))
+#define for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, mask) \
+ for ((cpu) = ~((typeof(cpu))0); \
+ (cpu) = next_cpu((cpu), (mask)), \
+ (cpu) < NR_CPUS; )
#endif
#if NR_CPUS <= 64
@@ -394,10 +394,10 @@ int __any_online_cpu(const cpumask_t *mask);
int __next_cpu_nr(int n, const cpumask_t *srcp);
#define next_cpu_nr(n, src) __next_cpu_nr((n), &(src))
#define cpus_weight_nr(cpumask) __cpus_weight(&(cpumask), nr_cpu_ids)
-#define for_each_cpu_mask_nr(cpu, mask) \
- for ((cpu) = first_cpu(mask); \
- (cpu) < nr_cpu_ids; \
- (cpu) = next_cpu_nr((cpu), (mask)))
+#define for_each_cpu_mask_nr(cpu, mask) \
+ for ((cpu) = ~((typeof(cpu))0); \
+ (cpu) = next_cpu_nr((cpu), (mask)), \
+ (cpu) < nr_cpu_ids; )
#endif /* NR_CPUS > 64 */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-12 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-11 13:50 [PATCH] Make for_each_cpu_mask a bit smaller Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-11 13:50 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-11 13:57 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-11 14:14 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-11 16:06 ` [RFC/PATCH] Make for_each_node_mask out-of-line Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-11 21:01 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-12 12:04 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-12 16:45 ` Mike Travis
2008-05-12 19:00 ` Alexander van Heukelum [this message]
2008-05-12 21:45 ` [PATCHv2] Make for_each_cpu_mask a bit smaller Andreas Schwab
2008-05-13 9:28 ` [PATCHv3] " Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-13 12:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-05-11 15:24 ` [PATCH] " Matthew Wilcox
2008-05-11 16:19 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-11 16:19 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-11 22:01 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-05-12 11:04 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-12 11:04 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-12 11:56 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080512190039.GA13324@mailshack.com \
--to=heukelum@mailshack.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=heukelum@fastmail.fm \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox