public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@mailshack.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
	ARCH <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>
Subject: [PATCHv3] Make for_each_cpu_mask a bit smaller
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 11:28:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080513092821.GA20416@mailshack.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jeej8742nt.fsf@sykes.suse.de>

The for_each_cpu_mask loop is used quite often in the kernel. It
makes use of two functions: first_cpu and next_cpu. This patch
changes for_each_cpu_mask to use only the latter. Because next_cpu
finds the next eligible cpu _after_ the given one, the iteration
variable has to be initialized to -1 and next_cpu has to be
called with this value before the first iteration. An x86_64
defconfig kernel (from sched/latest) is about 2500 bytes smaller
with this patch applied:

   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
6222517	 917952	 749932	7890401	 7865e1	vmlinux.orig
6219922	 917952	 749932	7887806	 785bbe	vmlinux

The same size reduction is seen for defconfig+MAXSMP

   text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
6241772	2563968	1492716	10298456	 9d2458	vmlinux.orig
6239211	2563968	1492716	10295895	 9d1a57	vmlinux

Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>

---

On Mon, May 12, 2008, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > +#define for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, mask)			\
> > +	for ((cpu) = ~((typeof(cpu))0);			\
> 
> There is no need for such a complicated expression, -1 will work for
> every (arithmetic) type.

Indeed, thanks.

This version applies on top of sched/latest.

This version reuses the already-existing api next_cpu instead
of inventing a new one; initializing the iteration counter to
-1 was suggested by Matthew Wilcox. Now with a -1 instead of
an overly carefull ~((typeof(cpu))0). "-1" is properly sign-
extended even if cpu is u64 in a 32-bit environment.

Greetings,
	Alexander

 include/linux/cpumask.h |   16 ++++++++--------
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/cpumask.h b/include/linux/cpumask.h
index 73434e5..c24a556 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpumask.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpumask.h
@@ -377,10 +377,10 @@ int __any_online_cpu(const cpumask_t *mask);
 #define first_cpu(src)		__first_cpu(&(src))
 #define next_cpu(n, src)	__next_cpu((n), &(src))
 #define any_online_cpu(mask) __any_online_cpu(&(mask))
-#define for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, mask)		\
-	for ((cpu) = first_cpu(mask);		\
-		(cpu) < NR_CPUS;		\
-		(cpu) = next_cpu((cpu), (mask)))
+#define for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, mask)			\
+	for ((cpu) = -1;				\
+		(cpu) = next_cpu((cpu), (mask)),	\
+		(cpu) < NR_CPUS; )
 #endif
 
 #if NR_CPUS <= 64
@@ -394,10 +394,10 @@ int __any_online_cpu(const cpumask_t *mask);
 int __next_cpu_nr(int n, const cpumask_t *srcp);
 #define next_cpu_nr(n, src)	__next_cpu_nr((n), &(src))
 #define cpus_weight_nr(cpumask)	__cpus_weight(&(cpumask), nr_cpu_ids)
-#define for_each_cpu_mask_nr(cpu, mask)		\
-	for ((cpu) = first_cpu(mask);		\
-		(cpu) < nr_cpu_ids;		\
-		(cpu) = next_cpu_nr((cpu), (mask)))
+#define for_each_cpu_mask_nr(cpu, mask)			\
+	for ((cpu) = -1;				\
+		(cpu) = next_cpu_nr((cpu), (mask)),	\
+		(cpu) < nr_cpu_ids; )
 
 #endif /* NR_CPUS > 64 */
 

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-13  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-11 13:50 [PATCH] Make for_each_cpu_mask a bit smaller Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-11 13:50 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-11 13:57 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-11 14:14 ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-11 16:06   ` [RFC/PATCH] Make for_each_node_mask out-of-line Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-11 21:01     ` Paul Jackson
2008-05-12 12:04       ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-12 16:45         ` Mike Travis
2008-05-12 19:00           ` [PATCHv2] Make for_each_cpu_mask a bit smaller Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-12 21:45             ` Andreas Schwab
2008-05-13  9:28               ` Alexander van Heukelum [this message]
2008-05-13 12:02                 ` [PATCHv3] " Ingo Molnar
2008-05-11 15:24 ` [PATCH] " Matthew Wilcox
2008-05-11 16:19   ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-11 16:19     ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-11 22:01     ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-05-12 11:04       ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-12 11:04         ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-05-12 11:56         ` Matthew Wilcox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080513092821.GA20416@mailshack.com \
    --to=heukelum@mailshack.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=heukelum@fastmail.fm \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=schwab@suse.de \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox