From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 6/6] byteorder: add copy_{endian} helpers Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 00:20:23 +0100 Message-ID: <20080604232022.GA28960@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1212428244.11008.40.camel@brick> <1212604681.6340.28.camel@brick> <1212608385.6340.32.camel@brick> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:40858 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755500AbYFDXVV (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2008 19:21:21 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1212608385.6340.32.camel@brick> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Harvey Harrison Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Andrew Morton , linux-arch , "tony.luck" On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 12:39:45PM -0700, Harvey Harrison wrote: > On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 21:34 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Jun 2008, Harvey Harrison wrote: > > > On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 21:15 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2 Jun 2008, Harvey Harrison wrote: > > Sounds still a bit strange to me... > > > > As `get' and `put' have connotations of reference counts, what about > > `load' and `store', e.g. `load_le32()' and `store_be16()'? > > > > Well, load is covered by le16_to_cpup and friends. What about the logical cpu_to_le16p then? -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: