From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] mm: generic show_mem() v4 Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2008 00:25:18 -0700 Message-ID: <20080701002518.7918fdaf.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20080627115349.743368154@saeurebad.de> <8763rq6qlc.fsf@skyscraper.fehenstaub.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:51285 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751299AbYGAHZx (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 03:25:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8763rq6qlc.fsf@skyscraper.fehenstaub.lan> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Johannes Weiner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 08:55:27 +0200 Johannes Weiner wrote: > Hi, > > Johannes Weiner writes: > > > Every arch implements its own show_mem() function. Most of them share > > quite some code, some of them are completely identical. > > > > This series implements a generic version of this function and migrates > > almost all architectures to it. > > > > version 4: > > - rebased against -mmotm > > Oh, btw, do you even want them, Andrew? These are only a few hundred patches ahead of my current backlog cursor :( I should be caught up mid-weekish. > Or should I base this set on > Linus' tree directly? That would be a bad step. Linus's tree is 2.6.26 whereas we're all developing 2.6.27. There's a ~30MB diff between the two.