linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@mailshack.com>
To: "Ricardo M. Correia" <Ricardo.M.Correia@Sun.COM>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	heukelum@fastmail.fm
Subject: [PATCH] x86: fix description of __fls(): __fls(0) is undefined
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 19:53:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080705175345.GA7698@mailshack.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1215276997.7167.12.camel@localhost>

Ricardo M. Correia spotted that the use of __fls() in fls64() did
not seem to make sense. In fact fls64()'s implementation is fine,
but the description of __fls() was wrong. Fix that.

Reported-by: "Ricardo M. Correia" <Ricardo.M.Correia@Sun.COM>
Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>

---

On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 05:56:37PM +0100, Ricardo M. Correia wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have a question about fls64() which I hope you or someone else could
> clarify, please see below.
> 
> On Sáb, 2008-03-15 at 18:32 +0100, Alexander van Heukelum wrote: 
> > +#elif BITS_PER_LONG == 64
> > +static inline int fls64(__u64 x)
> > +{
> > +	if (x == 0)
> > +		return 0;
> > +	return __fls(x) + 1;
> > +}
> 
> It seems fls64() is implemented on top of __fls(), however the __fls()
> implementation on the x86-64 architecture states that the result is
> undefined if the argument does not have any zero bits.

You have found a bug. It's not in fls64, though, but a copy/paste
one in the comment preceding __fls(). __fls() gives an undefined
result if there are no _set_ bits: only __fls(0) gives an undefined
result.

The inconsistency is well-spotted, though, thanks.

Patch is against current -tip.

Greetings,
    Alexander

> So if I understand correctly, the statement "fls64(~0ULL)" would return
> an undefined result on x64-64 instead of 64 as one would expect.
> 
> Wouldn't it make sense to check for ~0ULL in fls64()?
> 
> Thanks,
> Ricardo

---

diff --git a/include/asm-x86/bitops.h b/include/asm-x86/bitops.h
index 96b1829..cfb2b64 100644
--- a/include/asm-x86/bitops.h
+++ b/include/asm-x86/bitops.h
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ static inline unsigned long ffz(unsigned long word)
  * __fls: find last set bit in word
  * @word: The word to search
  *
- * Undefined if no zero exists, so code should check against ~0UL first.
+ * Undefined if no set bit exists, so code should check against 0 first.
  */
 static inline unsigned long __fls(unsigned long word)
 {

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-05 17:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-15 17:29 [0/3] Improve generic fls64 for 64-bit machines Alexander van Heukelum
2008-03-15 17:29 ` Alexander van Heukelum
     [not found] ` <20080315172913.GA21648-hWlb6USbxJRiLUuM0BA3LQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-03-15 17:30   ` [1/3] Introduce a generic __fls implementation Alexander van Heukelum
2008-03-15 17:30     ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-03-15 17:31   ` [2/3] Implement __fls on all 64-bit archs Alexander van Heukelum
2008-03-15 17:31     ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-03-15 17:32   ` [3/3] Use __fls for fls64 on " Alexander van Heukelum
2008-03-15 17:32     ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-07-05 16:56     ` Ricardo M. Correia
2008-07-05 17:53       ` Alexander van Heukelum [this message]
2008-07-05 17:53         ` [PATCH] x86: fix description of __fls(): __fls(0) is undefined Alexander van Heukelum
2008-07-18 12:33         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-21 13:10   ` [0/3] Improve generic fls64 for 64-bit machines Ingo Molnar
2008-03-21 13:10     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-03 17:19   ` Benny Halevy
2008-04-03 17:19     ` Benny Halevy
     [not found]     ` <47F511BF.8090506-C4P08NqkoRlBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-04 14:22       ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-04 14:22         ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-06 15:03         ` Benny Halevy
2008-04-06 15:03           ` Benny Halevy
     [not found]           ` <47F8E64C.9030104-C4P08NqkoRlBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-04-06 19:10             ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-04-06 19:10               ` Alexander van Heukelum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080705175345.GA7698@mailshack.com \
    --to=heukelum@mailshack.com \
    --cc=Ricardo.M.Correia@Sun.COM \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=heukelum@fastmail.fm \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).