From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Mundt Subject: Re: kbuild now support arch/$ARCH/include - time for ARCHs to convert Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2008 12:09:28 +0900 Message-ID: <20080809030927.GA7766@linux-sh.org> References: <20080728200500.GA14284@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20080731182315.GA18060@linux-mips.org> <20080809025244.GB9794@uranus.ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mta23.gyao.ne.jp ([125.63.38.249]:64981 "EHLO mx.gate01.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752894AbYHIDK1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Aug 2008 23:10:27 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080809025244.GB9794@uranus.ravnborg.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: Ralf Baechle , linux arch , LKML On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 04:52:44AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 07:23:15PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > I just did the necessary changes for MIPS and the first testbuild is running > > successfully so far. > > > > One of the ugly things in the MIPS makefiles is the use of platform- > > specific headers in include/asm-mips/mach-* which contain platform specific > > headers. Ideally those should be included through something like > > or and I think a directory like > > arch/$ARCH/$PLATFORM/include/plat/foobar.h could be a good place in the > > new scheme? I assume other platforms have similar issues with subplatforms, > > processor sub-architectures etc.? > > Hi Ralf. > > Did you follow what arm have planned? > It looks like MIPS should do things in the same way so > we get some consistency. > Where was this discussed? SH has the same issues obviously, but we've already settled on a scheme.