From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK and you Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 04:23:01 -0400 Message-ID: <20080912082301.GA28385@infradead.org> References: <20080912025733.E55F415420D@magilla.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:34150 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752233AbYILIXD (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2008 04:23:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080912025733.E55F415420D@magilla.localdomain> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Roland McGrath Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, utrace-devel@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 07:57:33PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: > 3. arch_ptrace() > > * You must define arch_ptrace() and not #define __ARCH_SYS_PTRACE. __ARCH_SYS_PTRACE is already gone :) > > 4. compat_arch_ptrace() > > * If your arch uses CONFIG_COMPAT, you must define > compat_arch_ptrace() and #define __ARCH_WANT_COMPAT_SYS_PTRACE. This should be gone for 2.6.28, too. (no ACK from the ia64 people yet, but mips and parisc are doen for sure)