Re: CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK and you

David Miller
2008-09-12T22:37:09Z

From: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:31:56 -0700 (PDT)

> > means sparc ends up allocating 38 * sizeof(u32) * sizeof(u32), and
> > sparc64 ends up with 36 * sizeof(u64) * sizeof(u64), which must surely
> > be wrong?
>
> Yup! Sure looks like Dave skipped the step where it says "test that core
> dumps work ... and produce correct results". :-)

It was allocating too much memory, which is harmless.

So it did work, and I did test it.