public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, crash-utility@redhat.com,
	Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Turn CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM in sysctl dev.mem.restricted
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 07:39:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081116073948.02aea58c@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1226846868-9595-1-git-send-email-bwalle@suse.de>

On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:47:45 +0100
Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de> wrote:

> While the original submission of CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM mentions that
> the option has been in RHEL and Fedora for 4 years without problems,
> that's only a half of the story. The truth is that at least RHEL
> has /dev/crash exactly to circumvent that /dev/mem restriction. Don't
> tell me that this is better than having that sysctl entry. ;-)

I assume /dev/crash is read only


but your series still makes absolutely no sense to me...
really. Nak.

You either want this at compile time or you don't want it at all.


-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, crash-utility@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Turn CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM in sysctl dev.mem.restricted
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 07:39:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081116073948.02aea58c@infradead.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20081116153948.6oGtfjx6QnW1WIKgH3PkK9_FTdjn7Mnc9uj-ALzo_aM@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1226846868-9595-1-git-send-email-bwalle@suse.de>

On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 15:47:45 +0100
Bernhard Walle <bwalle@suse.de> wrote:

> While the original submission of CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM mentions that
> the option has been in RHEL and Fedora for 4 years without problems,
> that's only a half of the story. The truth is that at least RHEL
> has /dev/crash exactly to circumvent that /dev/mem restriction. Don't
> tell me that this is better than having that sysctl entry. ;-)

I assume /dev/crash is read only


but your series still makes absolutely no sense to me...
really. Nak.

You either want this at compile time or you don't want it at all.


-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-11-16 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-16 14:47 Turn CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM in sysctl dev.mem.restricted Bernhard Walle
2008-11-16 14:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] Unify devmem_is_allowed across architectures Bernhard Walle
2008-11-16 14:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] Add dev.mem.restricted sysctl Bernhard Walle
2008-11-16 15:07   ` Willy Tarreau
2008-11-16 14:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] Remove CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM Bernhard Walle
2008-11-16 15:09   ` Alan Cox
2008-11-16 15:09     ` Alan Cox
2008-11-16 15:21     ` Bernhard Walle
2008-11-16 15:46       ` Alan Cox
2008-11-16 15:46         ` Alan Cox
2008-11-17 13:57       ` David Howells
2008-11-16 15:07 ` Turn CONFIG_STRICT_DEVMEM in sysctl dev.mem.restricted Alan Cox
2008-11-16 15:07   ` Alan Cox
2008-11-16 15:20   ` Bernhard Walle
2008-11-16 15:45     ` Alan Cox
2008-11-16 15:45       ` Alan Cox
2008-11-16 16:03       ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-11-16 16:09         ` Alan Cox
2008-11-16 16:09           ` Alan Cox
2008-11-16 16:19         ` Bernhard Walle
2008-11-16 16:11       ` Bernhard Walle
2008-11-16 17:03         ` Alan Cox
2008-11-16 17:03           ` Alan Cox
2008-11-16 15:39 ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2008-11-16 15:39   ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-11-16 15:56   ` Bernhard Walle
2008-11-16 16:06     ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-11-16 20:32   ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081116073948.02aea58c@infradead.org \
    --to=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=bwalle@suse.de \
    --cc=crash-utility@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox