From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: mn10300: Any plans to introduce arch/mn10300/include? Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:22:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20081125202212.GF7128@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <20081125200644.GA7128@uranus.ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from pfepb.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.236]:40688 "EHLO pfepb.post.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751287AbYKYUUt (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:20:49 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081125200644.GA7128@uranus.ravnborg.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: David Howells , Koichi Yasutake , linux-am33-list@redhat.com Cc: linux arch On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 09:06:44PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > Almost all other architectures has moved over to arch/$ARCH/include > > Are you planning to do so for mn10300 for next merge window? > > Remaining ones: frv, h8300, m32r, m68k and mn10300 h8300 already moved - there was a stale file that fooloed me. The other got a reminder too but I dropped linux-arch from cc. Sam