From: akpm@linux-foundation.org
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: holt@sgi.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@elte.hu, ptesarik@suse.cz, tony.luck@intel.com
Subject: + factor-out-ifdefs-from-kernel-spinlockc-to-lock_contended_flags.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:13:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200812030013.mB30DPAB032286@imap1.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
The patch titled
Factor out #ifdefs from kernel/spinlock.c to LOCK_CONTENDED_FLAGS
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
factor-out-ifdefs-from-kernel-spinlockc-to-lock_contended_flags.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
See http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/stuff/added-to-mm.txt to find
out what to do about this
The current -mm tree may be found at http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Factor out #ifdefs from kernel/spinlock.c to LOCK_CONTENDED_FLAGS
From: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
SGI has observed that on large systems, interrupts are not serviced for a
long period of time when waiting for a rwlock. The following patch series
re-enables irqs while waiting for the lock, resembling the code which is
already there for spinlocks.
I only made the ia64 version, because the patch adds some overhead to the
fast path. I assume there is currently no demand to have this for other
architectures, because the systems are not so large. Of course, the
possibility to implement raw_{read|write}_lock_flags for any architecture
is still there.
This patch:
The new macro LOCK_CONTENDED_FLAGS expands to the correct implementation
depending on the config options, so that IRQ's are re-enabled when
possible, but they remain disabled if CONFIG_LOCKDEP is set.
Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
include/linux/lockdep.h | 17 +++++++++++++++++
kernel/spinlock.c | 12 ++----------
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff -puN include/linux/lockdep.h~factor-out-ifdefs-from-kernel-spinlockc-to-lock_contended_flags include/linux/lockdep.h
--- a/include/linux/lockdep.h~factor-out-ifdefs-from-kernel-spinlockc-to-lock_contended_flags
+++ a/include/linux/lockdep.h
@@ -382,6 +382,23 @@ do { \
#endif /* CONFIG_LOCK_STAT */
+#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
+
+/*
+ * On lockdep we dont want the hand-coded irq-enable of
+ * _raw_*_lock_flags() code, because lockdep assumes
+ * that interrupts are not re-enabled during lock-acquire:
+ */
+#define LOCK_CONTENDED_FLAGS(_lock, try, lock, lockfl, flags) \
+ LOCK_CONTENDED((_lock), (try), (lock))
+
+#else /* CONFIG_LOCKDEP */
+
+#define LOCK_CONTENDED_FLAGS(_lock, try, lock, lockfl, flags) \
+ lockfl((_lock), (flags))
+
+#endif /* CONFIG_LOCKDEP */
+
#if defined(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS) && defined(CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS)
extern void early_init_irq_lock_class(void);
#else
diff -puN kernel/spinlock.c~factor-out-ifdefs-from-kernel-spinlockc-to-lock_contended_flags kernel/spinlock.c
--- a/kernel/spinlock.c~factor-out-ifdefs-from-kernel-spinlockc-to-lock_contended_flags
+++ a/kernel/spinlock.c
@@ -299,16 +299,8 @@ unsigned long __lockfunc _spin_lock_irqs
local_irq_save(flags);
preempt_disable();
spin_acquire(&lock->dep_map, subclass, 0, _RET_IP_);
- /*
- * On lockdep we dont want the hand-coded irq-enable of
- * _raw_spin_lock_flags() code, because lockdep assumes
- * that interrupts are not re-enabled during lock-acquire:
- */
-#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
- LOCK_CONTENDED(lock, _raw_spin_trylock, _raw_spin_lock);
-#else
- _raw_spin_lock_flags(lock, &flags);
-#endif
+ LOCK_CONTENDED_FLAGS(lock, _raw_spin_trylock, _raw_spin_lock,
+ _raw_spin_lock_flags, &flags);
return flags;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(_spin_lock_irqsave_nested);
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from holt@sgi.com are
mm-gup-persist-for-write-permission.patch
mm-wp-lock-page-before-deciding-cow.patch
mm-reuse_swap_page-replaces-can_share_swap_page.patch
mm-try_to_free_swap-replaces-remove_exclusive_swap_page.patch
mm-try_to_unuse-check-removing-right-swap.patch
mm-remove-try_to_munlock-from-vmscan.patch
mm-remove-gfp_mask-from-add_to_swap.patch
mm-add-add_to_swap-stub.patch
mm-optimize-get_scan_ratio-for-no-swap.patch
factor-out-ifdefs-from-kernel-spinlockc-to-lock_contended_flags.patch
allow-rwlocks-to-re-enable-interrupts.patch
ia64-implement-interrupt-enabling-rwlocks.patch
next reply other threads:[~2008-12-03 0:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-03 0:13 akpm [this message]
2008-12-03 0:13 ` + factor-out-ifdefs-from-kernel-spinlockc-to-lock_contended_flags.patch added to -mm tree akpm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200812030013.mB30DPAB032286@imap1.linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ptesarik@suse.cz \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox