public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] remove linux/hardirq.h from asm-generic/local.h
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 19:51:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081214195116.GB11223@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081214095803.9d16e85f.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 09:58:03AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 13:39:41 +0000 Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> 
> > While looking at reducing the amount of architecture namespace pollution
> > in the generic kernel, I found that asm/irq.h is included in the vast
> > majority of compilations on ARM (around 650 files.)
> > 
> > Since asm/irq.h includes a sub-architecture include file on ARM, this
> > causes a negative impact on the ccache's ability to re-use the build
> > results from other sub-architectures, so we have a desire to reduce
> > the dependencies on asm/irq.h.
> > 
> > It turns out that a major cause of this is the needless include of
> > linux/hardirq.h into asm-generic/local.h.  The patch below removes this
> > include, resulting in some 250 to 300 files (around half) of the kernel
> > then omitting asm/irq.h.
> > 
> > My test builds still succeed, provided two ARM files are fixed
> > (arch/arm/kernel/traps.c and arch/arm/mm/fault.c) - so there may be
> > negative impacts for this on other architectures.
> > 
> > Note that x86 does not include asm/irq.h nor linux/hardirq.h in its
> > asm/local.h, so this patch can be viewed as bringing the generic version
> > into line with the x86 version.
> 
> Sure.  Includes are easy to add and hard to remove.  I'll queue it up
> and see if there's fallout.

Thanks, I've committed to my git tree the addition of linux/hardirq.h to
those two files I mentioned above.  I guess at some point you'll pick
those up to prevent build errors on ARM?

> > From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
> > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> 
> that will result in the two rmk's getting separate akpm spam, different
> Author from Signer-offer, etc.  Adding an explicit From: line would
> improve things.

If they're sent as the same email, it doesn't matter.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:

  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-14 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-14 13:39 [RFC] remove linux/hardirq.h from asm-generic/local.h Russell King
2008-12-14 17:58 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-14 19:51   ` Russell King [this message]
2008-12-17  1:42     ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-16 18:47   ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-12-17  2:35     ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-17  5:45       ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-12-14 19:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-12-14 19:53   ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081214195116.GB11223@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox