From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Piggin Subject: Re: 2.6.29 -mm merge plans Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 02:05:01 +0100 Message-ID: <20090107010501.GA3390@wotan.suse.de> References: <20090105004300.19ed52d1.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090106225744.GA10553@infradead.org> <20090106150804.2697e0c2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:55898 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758662AbZAGBFC (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2009 20:05:02 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090106150804.2697e0c2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Andrew Morton Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 03:08:04PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > (suitable cc's added) > > On Tue, 6 Jan 2009 17:57:44 -0500 > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 12:43:00AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > mm-invoke-oom-killer-from-page-fault.patch > > > mm-invoke-oom-killer-from-page-fault-fix.patch > > > mm-invoke-oom-killer-from-page-fault-fix-fix-2.patch > > > > Just implementing this behaviour for x86 and uml is extremly > > counter-productive. Please fix up all architectures as this > > behaviour needs to be the same on all ports (at least those > > with a MMU) > > Yes, that would be nice. Yes I will do that. I cc'ed the linux-arch list a few times with hints ;) But if this is now going upstream I'll do a quick pass to convert the rest for 2.6.29.