From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: SET_PERSONALITY and TASK_SIZE
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:08:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090120080844.d681a750.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090118111831.GA4818@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:18:31 +0100 Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> while debugging I noticed the following comment in fs/binfmt_elf.c:
>
> /*
> * The early SET_PERSONALITY here is so that the lookup
> * for the interpreter happens in the namespace of the
> * to-be-execed image. SET_PERSONALITY can select an
> * alternate root.
> *
> * However, SET_PERSONALITY is NOT allowed to switch
> * this task into the new images's memory mapping
> * policy - that is, TASK_SIZE must still evaluate to
> * that which is appropriate to the execing application.
> * This is because exit_mmap() needs to have TASK_SIZE
> * evaluate to the size of the old image.
> *
> * So if (say) a 64-bit application is execing a 32-bit
> * application it is the architecture's responsibility
> * to defer changing the value of TASK_SIZE until the
> * switch really is going to happen - do this in
> * flush_thread(). - akpm
> */
Cripes, that must have been a different akpm.
> At least s390 isn't doing the deferred TASK_SIZE switch. Also it seems like
> MIPS, PARISC and IA64 don't do it either. However from a quick a view I
> couldn't see that exit_mmap depends on TASK_SIZE. So is this still necessary?
>
> And the bug I was looking for is this one: in SET_PERSONALITY we do this:
>
> if (current->personality != PER_LINUX32)
> set_personality(PER_LINUX);
>
> However we should use the PER_MASK if we want to check for PER_LINUX32,
> since there are more bits in the personality flags. In case any of the
> 'extra' bits is set we may incorrectly set personality to PER_LINUX even
> when we want PER_LINUX32.
>
> Looks like more architectures should do something like:
>
> if (personality(current->personality) != PER_LINUX32)
> ...
I'm stuck in planes and hotels for the rest of the week and don't have a
git tree to dig through, sorry. I'd prefer to hold off until next week
before diving into that one.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-20 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-18 11:18 SET_PERSONALITY and TASK_SIZE Heiko Carstens
2009-01-20 16:08 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-01-22 3:28 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090120080844.d681a750.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox