From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: liqin.chen@sunplusct.com
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] score - New architecure port to SunplusCT S+CORE processor
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:26:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200903271626.20863.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF23D2A1D1.74CB7871-ON48257586.00098D8A-48257586.0009CE62@sunplusct.com>
On Friday 27 March 2009, liqin.chen@sunplusct.com wrote:
> +
> +extern void cpu_cache_init (void);
> +extern void tlb_init (void);
In general, never put 'extern' declarations into a .c file. They are
part of an interface between different compilation units, so they
should be moved into a header file that is included by both of them.
> diff -uprN -x linux-2.6-git.ori/Documentation/dontdiff
> linux-2.6-git.ori/arch/score/kernel/signal.c
> linux-2.6-git.new/arch/score/kernel/signal.c
> --- linux-2.6-git.ori/arch/score/kernel/signal.c 1970-01-01
> 08:00:00.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-2.6-git.new/arch/score/kernel/signal.c 2009-03-26
> 15:32:23.000000000 +0800
As mentioned in my comment on system calls, this file should largely
not exist at all, because the generic rt_sig* system calls have
replaced these functions.
You will still need do_signal, sys_rt_sigaction and sys_rt_sigreturn,
maybe others, but not sys_sig*
> +#ifdef HAVE_ARCH_UNMAPPED_AREA
> +unsigned long arch_get_unmapped_area(struct file *filp, unsigned long
> addr,
> + unsigned long len, unsigned long pgoff, unsigned long flags)
> +{
> + struct vm_area_struct *vmm;
> + int do_color_align;
> + unsigned long task_size;
The #ifdef here looks wrong. You decide in asm/pgtable.h whether you
need it or not, but I would expect that decision to be constant.
Most new architectures don't need one. Why do you?
> +/* common code for old and new mmaps */
You only do "new" mmaps, so this function could be merged
into your sys_mmap2.
[note to myself: I should send my patch that provides
a generic version of this so architectures don't have to
copy it any more]
> +asmlinkage int sys_set_thread_area(unsigned long addr)
> +{
> + struct thread_info *ti = task_thread_info(current);
> +
> + ti->tp_value = addr;
> + return 0;
> +}
Why does this have to be a systemcall? Most architectures handle
TLS in user space.
> +asmlinkage int _sys_sysscore(int cmd, long arg1, int arg2, int arg3)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
What is this used for?
> +asmlinkage ssize_t sys_pwrite_wrapper(unsigned int fd, const char *buf,
> + long long count,loff_t pos)
> +{
> + return sys_pwrite64(fd, buf, (long) count, pos);
> +}
> +
> +asmlinkage ssize_t sys_pread_wrapper(unsigned int fd, char *buf,
> + long long count, loff_t pos)
> +{
> + return sys_pread64(fd, buf, (long) count, pos);
> +}
Just for consistency, I'd call these sys_pwrite64_wrapper and
sys_pread64_wrapper.
> +asmlinkage long
> +sys_fadvise64_wrapper(int fd, int unused, loff_t offset, size_t len, int
> advice)
> +{
> + return sys_fadvise64(fd, offset, len, advice);
> +}
This should probably be fadvise64_64, not fadvise64.
Arnd <><
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-27 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-27 1:45 [PATCH 10/13] score - New architecure port to SunplusCT S+CORE processor liqin.chen
2009-03-27 15:26 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2009-03-27 17:05 ` Kyle McMartin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200903271626.20863.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liqin.chen@sunplusct.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox