public inbox for linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven
	<geert.uytterhoeven-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: michal.simek-g5w7nrANp4BDPfheJLI6IQ@public.gmane.org,
	Linux Kernel list
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Removing __kernel_old_uid_t, git_t, dev_t
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:17:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200903301717.57184.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10f740e80903300741h387e6342veba0ccceea6714e9-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

On Monday 30 March 2009, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 15:58, Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * int-ll64 is used on all 32 bit architectures and on x86-64,
> > + * so use it as a reasonable default.
> > + */
> > +#include <asm-generic/int-ll64.h>
> > +
> 
> Most 64-bit archs have been migrated to ll64 by now.
> Alpha, ia64, and mips64 are the remaining exceptions.

Right, the comment is stale.

> > +/*
> > + * DMA addresses may be larger than pointers, but not smaller.
> > + * Do not define the dma64_addr_t type, which never really
> > + * worked.
> > + */
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_64BIT) || defined(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT)
> > +typedef u64 dma_addr_t;
> > +#else
> > +typedef u32 dma_addr_t;
> > +#endif /* 64 bit DMA pointer */
> 
> Is there any specific reason why dma_addr_t is in <asm/types.h>, while
> phys_addr_t is in
> <linux/types.h>?

dma_addr_t is a big mess that was traditionally defined per
architecture, in lots of wrong ways, including the misconception
of dma64_addr_t. Sparc64 still uses a 32 bit dma_addr_t, possibly
because it always uses an IOMMU (?). It can save some space in
scatterlists, but might come back to bite us if someone tries
to build a sparc64 system with actual 64-bit DMA.

phys_addr_t is a new definition that was added last August (after
I did my patch) by Jeremy Fitzhardinge and is for DMA purposes.

> Furthermore, CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT is used on PPC only. Probably it should be
> replaced by CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT, which is always set if CONFIG_64BIT,
> so the #ifdef above becomes even simpler?

Yes, they could be consolidated now, which would make the default
dma_addr_t the same as phys_addr_t, with the possible exception of
sparc64.

	Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert.uytterhoeven@gmail.com>
Cc: michal.simek@petalogix.com,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: Removing __kernel_old_uid_t, git_t, dev_t
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:17:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200903301717.57184.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
Message-ID: <20090330151756.0CaDj1B1wv9XMVIKkoJxme2GvHaEbC83vSRx4rE-EmI@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <10f740e80903300741h387e6342veba0ccceea6714e9@mail.gmail.com>

On Monday 30 March 2009, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 15:58, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * int-ll64 is used on all 32 bit architectures and on x86-64,
> > + * so use it as a reasonable default.
> > + */
> > +#include <asm-generic/int-ll64.h>
> > +
> 
> Most 64-bit archs have been migrated to ll64 by now.
> Alpha, ia64, and mips64 are the remaining exceptions.

Right, the comment is stale.

> > +/*
> > + * DMA addresses may be larger than pointers, but not smaller.
> > + * Do not define the dma64_addr_t type, which never really
> > + * worked.
> > + */
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_64BIT) || defined(CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT)
> > +typedef u64 dma_addr_t;
> > +#else
> > +typedef u32 dma_addr_t;
> > +#endif /* 64 bit DMA pointer */
> 
> Is there any specific reason why dma_addr_t is in <asm/types.h>, while
> phys_addr_t is in
> <linux/types.h>?

dma_addr_t is a big mess that was traditionally defined per
architecture, in lots of wrong ways, including the misconception
of dma64_addr_t. Sparc64 still uses a 32 bit dma_addr_t, possibly
because it always uses an IOMMU (?). It can save some space in
scatterlists, but might come back to bite us if someone tries
to build a sparc64 system with actual 64-bit DMA.

phys_addr_t is a new definition that was added last August (after
I did my patch) by Jeremy Fitzhardinge and is for DMA purposes.

> Furthermore, CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT is used on PPC only. Probably it should be
> replaced by CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT, which is always set if CONFIG_64BIT,
> so the #ifdef above becomes even simpler?

Yes, they could be consolidated now, which would make the default
dma_addr_t the same as phys_addr_t, with the possible exception of
sparc64.

	Arnd <><

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-30 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <49D071A8.4010703@petalogix.com>
2009-03-30 13:58 ` Removing __kernel_old_uid_t, git_t, dev_t Arnd Bergmann
2009-03-30 14:41   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
     [not found]     ` <10f740e80903300741h387e6342veba0ccceea6714e9-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-30 15:17       ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2009-03-30 15:17         ` Arnd Bergmann
     [not found]         ` <200903301717.57184.arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-30 21:11           ` David Miller
2009-03-30 21:11             ` David Miller
     [not found]             ` <20090330.141156.62568451.davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-31  0:26               ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-03-31  0:26                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-04-01 14:11           ` [RFC] asm-generic/{unistd,types,posix_types}.h for new arch Arnd Bergmann
2009-04-01 14:11             ` Arnd Bergmann
     [not found]             ` <200904011611.53355.arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-01 14:39               ` Will Newton
2009-04-01 14:39                 ` Will Newton
2009-04-01 15:04                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-04-01 15:04                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-04-01 21:20                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-04-01 21:32                     ` Roland McGrath
     [not found]                       ` <20090401213219.7B324FC3AB-nL1rrgvulkc2UH6IwYuUx0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
2009-04-02 13:06                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-04-02 13:06                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2009-04-01 17:55             ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200903301717.57184.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd-r2ngtmty4d4@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=geert.uytterhoeven-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=michal.simek-g5w7nrANp4BDPfheJLI6IQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox