From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: USE_ELF_CORE_DUMP? Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:48:23 -0600 Message-ID: <20090423184823.GV1926@parisc-linux.org> References: <20090423183331.GA19899@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:41362 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754086AbZDWSsY (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:48:24 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090423183331.GA19899@lst.de> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 08:33:31PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Currently all architectures but microblaze unconditionally define > USE_ELF_CORE_DUMP. The microblaze ommision seems like an error to > me, so can we just kill this ifdef and make sure we are the same > everywhere? That's presumably a leftover from a.out days ... kill it. -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."