From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: [RFC 00/17] asm-generic ABI files for microblaze Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:12:41 +0200 Message-ID: <20090427151241.GA10558@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <200904271640.44445.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200904271640.44445.arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, john.williams-g5w7nrANp4BDPfheJLI6IQ@public.gmane.org, monstr-pSz03upnqPeHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arch-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, liqin.chen-+XGAvkf1AAHby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org, Remis Lima Baima List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:40:43PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > This is my attempt to do a generic system call ABI for > all new architectures, including a port for microblaze, > which has recently been merged into 2.6.30. The next > architecture that is about to get merged will be score, > so it would be good if they can move to the same ABI. > > Please review the files and (in case of microblaze > and score maintainers) test them on your architecture. The submission is seriously broken. - subject is missing - reply-to-all is broken Can you resend with this fixed, then it makes review easier. Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-api" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pfepb.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.236]:35727 "EHLO pfepb.post.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932253AbZD0PKe (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:10:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:12:41 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: [RFC 00/17] asm-generic ABI files for microblaze Message-ID: <20090427151241.GA10558@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <200904271640.44445.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200904271640.44445.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, john.williams@petalogix.com, monstr@monstr.eu, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, liqin.chen@sunplusct.com, Remis Lima Baima Message-ID: <20090427151241.vCw0-1yvhn3uQXRpx5YOcA5ApQ0FQrlS1c2kAU3ruEM@z> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:40:43PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > This is my attempt to do a generic system call ABI for > all new architectures, including a port for microblaze, > which has recently been merged into 2.6.30. The next > architecture that is about to get merged will be score, > so it would be good if they can move to the same ABI. > > Please review the files and (in case of microblaze > and score maintainers) test them on your architecture. The submission is seriously broken. - subject is missing - reply-to-all is broken Can you resend with this fixed, then it makes review easier. Sam