From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/27] asm-generic: add generic versions of common headers Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:34:58 +0200 Message-ID: <200904301934.59415.arnd@arndb.de> References: <200904301849.45543.arnd@arndb.de> <200904301907.46515.arnd@arndb.de> <20090430.101231.27030060.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:62259 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933447AbZD3RgG convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:36:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090430.101231.27030060.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: David Miller Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, monstr@monstr.eu, remis.developer@googlemail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 30 April 2009, David Miller wrote: > You didn't read what I said. >=20 > I extract the commit messages and patches using "git format-patch" > merely as a formality, then I hand craft every aspect of the emails. Right, this is what I do for smaller sets of patches, but I was hoping for something slightly simpler when sending out my 27 (plus the previous 18) patches. > I never put "Date:" fields into the message body, that's rediculiousl= y > stupid. =A0And it confuses patchwork as well. =A0Just say NO. Right, fair enough. I figured it wouldn't hurt to have the date in the body because git-am can deal with it, but of course the problem was the wrong date in the header. Arnd <><