From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wright Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: remove pcibios_scan_all_fns() Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:43:22 -0700 Message-ID: <20090623014322.GA6729@sequoia.sous-sol.org> References: <20090622140807.25509.54448.stgit@bob.kio> <20090622143431.GT19977@parisc-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from sous-sol.org ([216.99.217.87]:49308 "EHLO sequoia.sous-sol.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751464AbZFWBtI (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:49:08 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090622143431.GT19977@parisc-linux.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Alex Chiang , jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Kyle McMartin , Tony Luck , Russell King , Arnd Bergmann , Yoshinori Sato , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Jeff Dike , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle , David Howells , Paul Mundt , Ivan Kokshaysky , Ingo Molnar , "David S. Miller" * Matthew Wilcox (matthew@wil.cx) wrote: > I'd like to know what the KVM / Xen / ... people think about this. > I don't know if they rely on function 5 being able to show up out of > the blue. KVM does not rely on this. Typically a multi-function device's BDF gets remapped between host and guest (usually becoming a single function, function 0). thanks, -chris