From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>,
microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] linker script: unify usage of discard definition
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 00:37:17 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090704153717.GA9933@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8bd0f97a0907032251p753527e1oac25ea1740a1bfdb@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Jul 04, 2009 at 01:51:04AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 19:37, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * DISCARDS must be the last and archs which want some of the default
> > + * discarded sections in the kernel image can do so by putting them in
> > + * earlier section definition.
> > + */
>
> i would add to the comment that some people want to discard exit
> text/data at runtime rather than link time due to cross-section
> references such as alt instructions, bug table, eh_frame, etc...
>
> otherwise, looks good to me. thanks !
>
> Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Agreed, as this was a source of confusion initially it is certainly worth
documenting the next time someone is scratching their head thinking about
the variations ;-)
Acked-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-04 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-03 23:37 [RFC PATCH] linker script: unify usage of discard definition Tejun Heo
2009-07-03 23:37 ` Tejun Heo
2009-07-04 1:34 ` linux-next submission requirements (Was: [RFC PATCH] linker script: unify usage of discard definition) Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-04 3:18 ` Tejun Heo
2009-07-04 4:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-04 4:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-04 4:07 ` Tejun Heo
2009-07-04 5:51 ` [RFC PATCH] linker script: unify usage of discard definition Mike Frysinger
2009-07-04 15:37 ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2009-07-04 18:40 ` [microblaze-uclinux] " Michal Simek
2009-07-06 6:17 ` Michal Simek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090704153717.GA9933@linux-sh.org \
--to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=microblaze-uclinux@itee.uq.edu.au \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vapier.adi@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).