Re: handle_mm_fault() calling convention cleanup..

Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-06T10:56:16Z

On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 09:31 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> I have no problems with that. I'd always intended to have flags
> go further up the call chain like Linus did (since we'd discussed
> perhaps making faults interruptible and requiring an extra flag
> to distinguish get_user_pages callers that were not interruptible).
>
> So yes adding more flags to improve code or make things simpler
> is fine by me :)
>
That's before you see my evil plan of bringing the flags all the way
down to set_pte_at() :-)

Cheers,
Ben.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: email@kvack.org