From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bjorn Helgaas Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 15:18:13 -0600 Message-ID: <200907101518.13894.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> References: <20090710125755.559739294@chello.nl> <20090710130125.037018244@chello.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from g5t0009.atlanta.hp.com ([15.192.0.46]:46576 "EHLO g5t0009.atlanta.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751449AbZGJVST (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:18:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090710130125.037018244@chello.nl> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Matt Mackall , Anton Vorontsov , Andrew Morton , oleg@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu, tony.luck@intel.com, rth@twiddle.net, geert@linux-m68k.org On Friday 10 July 2009 06:57:56 am Peter Zijlstra wrote: > +#define INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0(1) If the parentheses are useful or necessary, I need to be educated about why. They look like superfluous paranoia to me.