From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Amerigo Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Move generated files to include/generated Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:58:18 +0800 Message-ID: <20090722095818.GH6281@cr0.nay.redhat.com> References: <20090721211040.GA7688@merkur.ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.177]:9259 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752858AbZGVJ4I (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:56:08 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090721211040.GA7688@merkur.ravnborg.org> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sam Ravnborg Cc: linux-kbuild , lkml , linux arch , Al Viro On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 11:10:40PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: >In 2.6.30 we introduced support for adding generated >files to a dedicated directory named "include/generated". > Personally, I don't like this, I hate to see #include . >This had a number of benefits: > > - avoid mixing generated and normal files I don't think this is an advantage... > - allow us to finally kill the asm symlink This makes sense, but it looks like only when 'make O=xxx', no? > - simpler .gitignore rules > - simpler list of mrproper files Neither these two. The benifits we get is little, I think. Thanks.