linux-arch.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
	Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@tiscali.co.uk>, ralf <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb()
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:25:29 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090728002529.GB22668@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1248740260.30993.26.camel@pasglop>

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:17:40AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 12:11 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Jul 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hrm... my powerpc-next branch will contain stuff that depend on it, so
> > > I'll probably have to pull it in though, unless I tell all my
> > > sub-maintainers to also pull from that other branch first :-)
> > 
> > Ok, I'll just apply the patch. It does look obvious enough.
> 
> There seem to be a MIPS and SH breakage as a result but I can't see
> how my patch would have broken it, ie, it looks like the bug was
> already in those two archs. The error is that it complains about a
> duplicate definition of __pmd_free_tlb() between those arch pgalloc.h
> and pgtable-nopmd.h
> 
> For MIPS, when CONFIG_32BIT is set, asm/pgalloc.h redefines
> __pmd_free_tlb despite the fact that it's already defined by
> asm-generic/pgtable-nopmd.h (via via pgtable.h via linux/mm.h).
> 
> I -suspect- what happens is that the compiler, before, would ignore the
> double definition (or maybe just warn) due to the definition being
> strictly identical. With the new argument added, it's no longer the case
> as it's called "a" in asm-generic and "addr" in mips... oops.
> 
> In any case, can Ralf and Paul check if the following patch is correct ?
> 
Yup, that seems to be what happened. I've never seen a warning about this
with any compiler version, otherwise we would have caught this much
earlier. As soon as the addr -> a rename took place it blew up
immediately as a redefinition. Is there a magical gcc flag we can turn on
to warn on identical definitions, even if just for testing?

> >From 41928c7945d855ae0eb053eadad590ab6876847e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:16:48 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] mm: Remove duplicate definitions in MIPS and SH
> 
> Those definitions are already provided by asm-generic
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

Builds and boots fine, thanks.

Acked-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-07-28  0:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-15  7:49 [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb() Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-15 13:56 ` [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te, ud, md}_free_tlb() Nick Piggin
2009-07-15 13:56   ` [RFC/PATCH] mm: Pass virtual address to [__]p{te,ud,md}_free_tlb() Nick Piggin
2009-07-16  1:54   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-16  1:54     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-20  8:10     ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-20 10:00       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-20 10:00         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-20 10:38         ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-21  0:02           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-21  0:02             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-21  7:05             ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-20  7:11   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-20  7:11     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-20  7:48     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-20  7:48       ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-07-20  8:05     ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-20  8:05       ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-20  9:59       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-20  9:59         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-20 10:39         ` Nick Piggin
2009-07-22 16:31     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-23  0:53       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-23  0:59         ` Kumar Gala
2009-07-27 19:11         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-27 19:11           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-27 21:35           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-27 21:35             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-28  0:17           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-28  0:17             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-28  0:25             ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2009-07-28  0:41               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-28  0:41                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-07-16  1:36 ` Michael Ellerman
2009-07-16  1:56   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-16  1:56     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2009-07-20 12:46 ` David Howells
2009-07-20 12:46   ` David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090728002529.GB22668@linux-sh.org \
    --to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=hugh@tiscali.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).